southernyahoo Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Bigfoot isn't proven to be anything, unless it is human. Human is ape, and is the only result we have that is remotely close to what bigfoot must be, if it exists. If the other evidence for bigfoot didn't also have the same ear marks, I would find it pointless to debate the DNA findings. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Human DNA doesn't mean ape. Apes aren't humans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Humans are great apes Darrell. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape The Hominidae include orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and humans.[1][2] Alternatively, the family are collectively described as the great apes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Didn't know chimp, orang, or gorilla DNA results come back as a positive hit for modern human. They don't of course, but you go ahead and believe what you need to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 And BF is not Chimp, Gorilla or Orang. That would be easy enough to tell from videos and they would have been documented like a hundred years ago. If BF were a hairy human, well that might be too much for some to handle wouldn't it? That old perception that anything that lives in the wild and is covered in hair must be a beast or freak of nature, which should be feared , exterminated or denied all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david75090 Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Humans come in all shapes and sizes from pygmies to Shaquille O'Neal, that we know of. What if there's some more versions of human that haven't been proven? We could compare Great Danes to Chihuahuas and say they're both dogs, which were, somehow, bred from wolves. Things are not always what they appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Can we list some (semi) agreeded upon characteristics of Bigfoot? I feel like there are going to be a lot of things we just don't see in humans. It seems pretty unlikely that a creature could be that different, yet have the same exact DNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Mbh, you are right. The phenomena as a whole is grasping at straws to validate their belief system. Big foot ain't just a giant hairy human with huge feet. Bigfoot isn't anything real based on any evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Can we list some (semi) agreeded upon characteristics of Bigfoot? I feel like there are going to be a lot of things we just don't see in humans. It seems pretty unlikely that a creature could be that different, yet have the same exact DNA. The same exact DNA so far is only shown in the mitochondria on purported samples, which is just a tiny "seperate from the nucleus" , "inherited fully intact without recombination", piece of an organisms genetic make up. Our genetics in the mtDNA could not be in bigfoot unless they could mate with us and produce fertile offspring. If it can mate with us and produce fertile offspring, then it is human. This is inescapable whatever the differences might appear to be. So the only thing to debate is whether these results will continue, even with a specimen, or will we ever find the holy grail "unknown primate" mtDNA sequence. I simply won't hold my breath for the later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 So tell me this, what does bigfoot becomes next year when you have to redefine what it is again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 The same exact DNA so far is only shown in the mitochondria on purported samples, which is just a tiny "seperate from the nucleus" , "inherited fully intact without recombination", piece of an organisms genetic make up. Our genetics in the mtDNA could not be in bigfoot unless they could mate with us and produce fertile offspring. If it can mate with us and produce fertile offspring, then it is human. This is inescapable whatever the differences might appear to be. So the only thing to debate is whether these results will continue, even with a specimen, or will we ever find the holy grail "unknown primate" mtDNA sequence. I simply won't hold my breath for the later. which one us is willing to test the idea of mating with a BF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Well, the two tone female I saw while fishing did have some rather "fetching" features. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 So tell me this, what does bigfoot becomes next year when you have to redefine what it is again? It will be ape no matter what, if it's there at all, and if it's not technically human, I'll just admit that I'm wrong and still watch the definition of human be changed, because BF is pushing it to the limits right now. which one us is willing to test the idea of mating with a BF? I would put it this way mbh, homo sapiens have the sexiest women on the planet and there is no evidence there is a BF male that would disagree with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIB Posted July 7, 2014 Moderator Share Posted July 7, 2014 (edited) which one us is willing to test the idea of mating with a BF? I have 2 conditions: she's gotta take a bath and she can't eat crackers in my sleeping bag. From there on ... it's negotiable. Beauty is only skin deep and her personality would have to be preferable to that of some of the scoffers around here. MIB Edited July 7, 2014 by MIB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotter Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 ^LOL! Home run! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts