bipedalist Posted May 16, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted May 16, 2015 Elk are all over the base and zone of MSH. Seen many myself from a distance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) This was our own BigTreeWalker, yes? I think so. It sounds like it's him. Edited May 16, 2015 by OntarioSquatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTreeWalker Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 Busted! My stance is a little different from Mr Townsend's. However, we both agree on the importance of the evidence. I did comment on the DNA testing in the What about the Bones thread. I do have hair samples pulled off the bones also. Right now we felt the most compelling evidence was the bones themselves. As Mr Townsend stated in the interview, the bones are available for further in depth study. However, they will remain in our custody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Congrats, BigTreeWalker. This is very exciting research and I'm glad to see it get some attention from the press. When you say your stance is a little different, are you referring to the idea that BF are hybrids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigantor Posted May 16, 2015 Admin Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) Sweeet! can't wait for an independent examination of the evidence. In the mean time, big kudos for making such a great discovery, hope it holds up under scrutiny! you may have something here. Edited May 16, 2015 by gigantor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagniAesir Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Inter-breeding with native Americans for 80,000 years Yeah right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTreeWalker Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) Congrats, BigTreeWalker. This is very exciting research and I'm glad to see it get some attention from the press. When you say your stance is a little different, are you referring to the idea that BF are hybrids? Thanks everyone! I just feel there are some conclusions we cannot be absolute about until more of this type of evidence comes to light. There is something we both agree on, once this evidence is presented, then if more is found, the stronger our conclusions can be. Gigantor, close expert scrutiny is what is hoped for. Inter-breeding with native Americans for 80,000 years Yeah right MagniAesir, there has been some reining in during the course of this research and I suspect that will be the case here. 'nuff said. Edited May 16, 2015 by BigTreeWalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSA Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 While I admire the originality of the science here, extrapolating the origins of the gnawer might be just a wee bit of overreach. I might not have been able to resist that urge either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted May 16, 2015 Admin Share Posted May 16, 2015 Are we positive that the teeth marks are not the result of a Porcupine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lightheart Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Big Tree Walker Is this your research being highlighted on Bigfoot Evidence? I applaud what you are doing. Looks like you are definitely onto something here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted May 16, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted May 16, 2015 Wicked little chompers there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Divergent1 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Are we positive that the teeth marks are not the result of a Porcupine? If you read the details about the bite measurements and look at the links for typical shapes of skulls for predators there is no way to mistake the bite marks for porcupines or anything else. Of course you can't say what it is, but this is hard evidence that you need to inspire someone to actually pay attention to people who claim to have seen a sasquatch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted May 16, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) Obviously porcupine have rodent like incisors, those marks seemed to have been missing if you read the article. No evidence the bones had been scattered as porcupine do too. In fact there was mention that after some time other animals seemed to stay away from the bone piles as I read it. Wholesale consumption of bone was not evident only stripping and chipping as I read the article. Edited May 16, 2015 by bipedalist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfooter Posted May 16, 2015 Admin Share Posted May 16, 2015 MOD NOTE: merged the "Stacked Bones: Human-Like Teeth Centralia College Finds" thread with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted May 16, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted May 16, 2015 Even though this one is "In the field" section (which is appropriate) and not in General Discussion I appreciate linking it back to the original pictures and research notes. If we don't get enough hits with it as ITF maybe it could move back to General Discussion. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts