Is the US government actively trying to make the Sasquatch race extinct?

[Huntster]

6 hours ago, SWWASAS said:

.........Show me a picture of the "nest" or anything else being searched by individuals dressed in street clothes rather than clean room suits without masks and I will raise the contamination issue.......

 

Here you go. Start kicking ass on these amateurish buffoons dressed in all manner of garb, including what looks like gay pride rubber boots. I've got your back.

 

Oh, the context: this is Denisova Cave in Siberia where a 40,000 year old silver of a finger bone supposedly produced dna so contamination-free that a new species of human was declared, a whole new series of scientific evolution theory proffered, and further digging in gay pride boots funded.

 

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/researchers-home-in-on-when-different-hominins-shared-denisova-cave-65412

[SWWASAS]

If I have seen enough in 12 years to convince me of bigfoot existence,   there have to be dozens of Forest Rangers and Fish and Wildlife people who have seen more than I have.    Is the culture in those agencies such that they are afraid to say anything to anyone?    Or is the official policy not to discuss what they have seen?    Next time I talk to a Forest Ranger I am going to ask that question.   I was with a female companion in Southern Oregon and she asked a Ranger in a visitor center where a good place to see bigfoot would be.   I expected a "there is no such thing" response.   With only a slight pause the woman Ranger gave us a location of a fairly recent sighting.    Perhaps we need to start asking a standard question at different facilities and see if there is a standard response.   A standard response would at least indicate the agency has established guidelines that are likely written down.    Anyone know a retired Forest Ranger?  

[Mizzy D]

Hah, I tried that old tactic when entering Custer State Park a couple of months ago, asked the ranger at the gate "seen any Bigfoot lately?" to which she replied "not lately" (quick thinking but really just mimicking my words)....been several sightings reported up there & on the way up there, one just 5 miles from my house...+ a friend was over recently & said he'd been driving up onto some old maintenance roads in the park & found some really big bare footprints in the snow way up at a remote dead end.   I plan to get up there and do some more scouting/snooping/asking around when the season opens again in 2020...even considering a part time volunteer position at the visitor's center....I'm gonna get to the bottom of something somehow....I figure once you're "part of them" more info than the usual might be forthcoming.   

[bipedalist]

^ Joe Beelart documents some of the rangers in his book, some of them know I would think. 

[Huntster]

State game biologists would be in just as good or better position to know as federal forest rangers. Ditto timber cruisers, most of whom now are private contractors.

[hiflier]

3 hours ago, Mizzy D said:

....I figure once you're "part of them" more info than the usual might be forthcoming

 

Good first post, Mizzy D. If you do follow up on a volunteer basis I would start off real slow. As in not say anything until you get e feel for things? If you eve happen to find something interesting then bring someone in on it ASAP and ask all the right questions without saying anything on the subject of Bigfoot. Let some time go by and maybe hint sometime that your going to go look around in the same general area and ask if anyone wants to join you for safety reasons. It may very well be that someone with a personal interest will step up also saying nothing on the subject. Especially in front of their peers. Ya never know. And good luck with any volunteer opportunities.

[guyzonthropus]

Welcome Mizzy D! That's a great idea to volunteer at such a spot, and over a season feel out the other folks there as to what they might know. Crafty!

Unless of course they swear you into their unspoken silence! 

[Mizzy D]

13 hours ago, hiflier said:

 

If you do follow up on a volunteer basis I would start off real slow. As in not say anything until you get e feel for things? If you eve happen to find something interesting then bring someone in on it ASAP and ask all the right questions without saying anything on the subject of Bigfoot. Let some time go by and maybe hint sometime that your going to go look around in the same general area and ask if anyone wants to join you for safety reasons. It may very well be that someone with a personal interest will step up also saying nothing on the subject. Especially in front of their peers. Ya never know. And good luck with any volunteer opportunities.

All good suggestions, hiflier, staying stealth for awhile an excellent idea....and as far as me going off by myself somewhere, not gonna happen, be nice to find some serious buddies to explore the park, 71,000 acres of thick forest, plentiful food & abundant water sources has to be a fertile "hunting" ground. I can actually see the Needles Highway & Mount Rushmore from my living room so 15+ or minus miles isn't far to go for some cheap thrills.

 

One of the BFRO reports came from just 5-6 miles away from me, very close to a place called Bear Country. I've been there & it'd be extremely easy pickings for the big guys to "grab a snack" anytime, the animals are all basically free range but fenced in & there are tons of babies, everything from mountain goats to bear cubs to buffalo....wonder if they keep a running inventory on their animal populations & if there are ever any missing?  

 

Thanks for the welcome, guyzonthropus, yeh, sworn to secrecy...officially maybe, privately, not bloody likely... 

Edited October 25, 2019 by Mizzy D
add last paragraph

[RedHawk454]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ9tqwITuag

 

Edited November 1, 2019 by RedHawk454

[The Truth]

It's hard to know if there's a cover up or not. Considering the fact that not even the most ardent outdoorsmen have any empirical evidence of sasquatch, I think that it would be equally as challenging for governments to have said evidence. But then, there is the Paterson film. But that then depends on what your stance is concerning it. 

[Huntster]

36 minutes ago, The Truth said:

........Considering the fact that not even the most ardent outdoorsmen have any empirical evidence of sasquatch, I think that it would be equally as challenging for governments to have said evidence........

 

If a state fish and game agency announced a $1000 bounty on a sasquatch, my bet is that there would be one on a slab within two deer seasons. Most of all, it would give a legal green light, in addition to the greed factor.

[Twist]

24 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

If a state fish and game agency announced a $1000 bounty on a sasquatch, my bet is that there would be one on a slab within two deer seasons. Most of all, it would give a legal green light, in addition to the greed factor.

 

If produced by a government funded hunter sure,  if counted on by the normal "citizen" hunter, I wouldn't give it much better of a chance then we have now.   I believe any true hunter worth his salt has the means to make a BF body worth well over $1000 right now and keep their name 100% anonymous.  

[Huntster]

57 minutes ago, Twist said:

 

If produced by a government funded hunter sure,  if counted on by the normal "citizen" hunter, I wouldn't give it much better of a chance then we have now.   I believe any true hunter worth his salt has the means to make a BF body worth well over $1000 right now and keep their name 100% anonymous.  

 

A true hunter worth his salt won't violate the law, or even take questionable shots. I won't shoot a sasquatch unless defending myself just like I won't shoot most bears anymore. I don't need any more dead bears........maybe one, if he's a real dandy.

 

Pay me to shoot them?

 

BOOM!

[xspider1]

I really like part of your idea, Hunster.  Maybe the guvment should offer a million dollars bounty for a live Bigfoot!  Such a thing would certainly pay for itself many times over...   

Edited November 6, 2019 by xspider1

[Madison5716]

4 hours ago, The Truth said:

Considering the fact that not even the most ardent outdoorsmen have any empirical evidence of sasquatch

 

I'm sure this guy might disagree. Check out his very interesting channel.