BobbyO Posted April 28, 2012 SSR Team Posted April 28, 2012 Yeah that's it, done. An apology is always accepted if someone has the courtesy to give one.. 3
Sasfooty Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 I didn't find the picture to be all that offensive......considering. Perhaps somebody could clue me in?
Guest Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 I found two interviews and listened to them both. Also listened to Bart Cutino give his take. I have to correct my post here. I listened to two versions of the SAME interview. One of them was an edited version and the other was the full interview. I didn't realize I was listening to the same interview in both recordings. I didn't find the picture to be all that offensive......considering. Perhaps somebody could clue me in? Your profile picture offends me. Don't you know that smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer in circus oragutans????
Sasfooty Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 If that one offends you, it's good that you haven't been treated to previous ones. 1
Guest Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 If that one offends you, it's good that you haven't been treated to previous ones.
bipedalist Posted April 28, 2012 BFF Patron Posted April 28, 2012 (edited) I didn't find the picture to be all that offensive......considering. Perhaps somebody could clue me in? Well, I think the picture could be interpreted in multiple different ways. It was actually attaching a name to the graphic that kind of I thought was the questionable part..... loosely questionable as the surname in the graphic was not linked to a totally anonymous member to those that read the forum in it's entirety and this thread exhaustively. .....If that one offends you, it's good that you haven't been treated to previous ones. For example? Edited April 28, 2012 by bipedalist
Sasfooty Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Well, his name isn't exactly a secret, but you're right about that part. It would have been best to leave the name off. However, it would be a lot more "offensive" if somebody made an illustration of the actual story of the shooting. For example? I was referring to some of my previous ones.
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Guys, once again I'm sorry. Justin Smeja is a member here. I wish I knew it sooner. It was dumb of me to do that.
Guest tpick Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 Guys, once again I'm sorry. Justin Smeja is a member here. I wish I knew it sooner. It was dumb of me to do that. That's cool bro. Movin on now...
BobbyO Posted April 29, 2012 SSR Team Posted April 29, 2012 Guys, once again I'm sorry. Justin Smeja is a member here. I wish I knew it sooner. It was dumb of me to do that. No he's not, not by user name anyway, but " General " is.. Just think a little bit, that's all..
indiefoot Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 Drop down and give us 50 push-ups...... oh wait, that was high school.
BobbyO Posted April 29, 2012 SSR Team Posted April 29, 2012 No, that's more sarcasm trying to be disguised as humour, that's what that is.. I think it's wrong for people to refer to other members, when they have a handle/user name, by their real name. But forgive me if you think that's ok, what's your real name Indie ?
indiefoot Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 He said he was wrong and I pointed out with some humor that we have all been there.
Guest Jodie Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 General outed himself, therefore he is fair game either way you want to refer to him on here.
Recommended Posts