norseman Posted July 10, 2022 Admin Share Posted July 10, 2022 On 7/9/2022 at 9:52 AM, Huntster said: That's pretty much how I feel about it, with this addition: It could be the Man on the Moon, for all I care. It moves the ball......into the stands for it to be batted around by every drunk Bozo who went to the game. But it in no way whatsoever leads to any conclusion regarding sasquatchery. In the case of the PG film, there are three possibilities, and three possibilities only: 1) It is a man in a suit 2) It is an uncatalogued creature 3) It is an extraterrestrial entity (which, really, is included in Possibility #2) That's it. Period. End of discussion........if it's possible to end any discussion among people, which of course, it's not. In this case? Pfft. It's a waste of time, and this post is my contribution to that waste. Sorry, Dude.......I'm pretty sure that's a bear. Exactly! Which proves why the Jacobs photo? Is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 I am surprised that a bear photo garners so much attention on a Sasquatch forum. I really shouldn't be. People actually think that the US government released videos of alien aircraft (tic tac ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted July 10, 2022 Admin Share Posted July 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: I am surprised that a bear photo garners so much attention on a Sasquatch forum. I really shouldn't be. People actually think that the US government released videos of alien aircraft (tic tac ). I really shouldn’t be…..here? Freudian slip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, norseman said: I really shouldn’t be…..here? Freudian slip? Lol. No doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grubfingers Posted July 10, 2022 Author Share Posted July 10, 2022 27 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: I am surprised that a bear photo garners so much attention It’s not the bears. It’s the young Sasquatch that comes along 30 minutes later that jumps into a somersault position in seconds after the first camera snap that gets the looks, nothing came by after that. I have an update today on the somersault photo the Pennsylvania Game Commission was unable to replicate it with a sick bear photo! Yes they have several bear with mange photos but despite “seeing them all the time rubbing their itchy mange heads on the ground like a dog” there’s no matches! Same with the right twist chimpanzee looking photo. (Biologist Jerry Feaser) Along with accurate measurements showing arms longer than the torso that was no bear my friends it was most likely a young Sasquatch with so many sightings of it there on the map now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grubfingers Posted July 10, 2022 Author Share Posted July 10, 2022 Notice the right twist probably turning away from the camera seconds before it tucks its head down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grubfingers Posted July 10, 2022 Author Share Posted July 10, 2022 The just can’t get them to somersault like a Sasquatch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 31 minutes ago, Grubfingers said: Notice the right twist probably turning away from the camera seconds before it tucks its head down. I will give you an A for persistence . I admire it. You are a nice person. I will stay out of this mistaken identity thread. Never going to convince me that any of these pictures depict anything other than a bear. Not chimp, not Sasquatch nothing but a bear. Notice I dropped the mangy part. 😆 Still a bear 🐻 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grubfingers Posted July 10, 2022 Author Share Posted July 10, 2022 7 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: I will give you an A for persistence . I admire it. You are a nice person. I will stay out of this mistaken identity thread. Never going to convince me That’s OK I agree to disagree there’s always gonna be folks that think Patty was a guy in a costume, or this was just a contorted ninja bear with arms longer than all the other bears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: ........People actually think that the US government released videos of alien aircraft (tic tac ). The government is releasing radar images of things that they allege to be unidentified aerial vehicles. They aren't claiming that they're extraterrestrial. They're letting the public lead themselves to that opinion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted July 10, 2022 Admin Share Posted July 10, 2022 9 minutes ago, Grubfingers said: That’s OK I agree to disagree there’s always gonna be folks that think Patty was a guy in a costume, or this was just a contorted ninja bear with arms longer than all the other bears. The hard skeptic is hand in hand with the hard believer…. They pick their position and then work backwards through the evidence and cherry pick what supports their position. And of course they attack or dismiss any evidence that doesn’t support their position. Very unscientific. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Pics for comparison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grubfingers Posted July 11, 2022 Author Share Posted July 11, 2022 Brilliant Doug! The bear torso is too long to stretch out the arms like the Jacobs photo does. It is without a doubt a short torso primate!!! Skeptics? Picture the bear with his head under the arm pit now the shoulder is even closer to the ground!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larryzfoot Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 Why is anything extraterrestrial being brought into this, that's got nothing to do with a photo that is in all likelihood, just a mangy bear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 57 minutes ago, Larryzfoot said: Why is anything extraterrestrial being brought into this, that's got nothing to do with a photo that is in all likelihood, just a mangy bear. Why is mange being brought into this? The photo subject isn't hairless or patchy. The extraterrestrials appear to be the discussion participants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts