Huntster Posted January 18 Posted January 18 1 hour ago, hiflier said: Thanks, although I consider you way more qualified than Mr. Sixpack........ No way. Indeed, I can't even go through a six pack like a real man anymore, and I'm certainly not an accredited scientist. I have no qualifications at all. I guess I need to buy a few cases of beer and get back in shape........ Quote .......We've already seen mtDNA mutations in Dr. Hart's chart. I sent it to two state biologists as well as the state university;s head of its genetics lab for opinion and assessment........ I didn't know that. Good on you and Dr. Hart.
hiflier Posted January 18 Posted January 18 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Huntster said: No way. Indeed, I can't even go through a six pack like a real man anymore, and I'm certainly not an accredited scientist. I have no qualifications at all. I guess I need to buy a few cases of beer and get back in shape........ I didn't know that. Good on you and Dr. Hart. It's because I don't always let on with all that I do and have done. You have no Idea about what I'm tackling right now. It's a fairly serious matter and involves a very high profile person in the community. But I do have an idea for here. How about we all get our heads together and find the name of a geneticist within the USFWS? Maybe one at their forensics lab in Ashland, Oregon. Any harm in doing that? Not asking anyone to do anything. Just find a name, or two, or three? And I'll take it from there. Edited January 18 by hiflier
Huntster Posted January 18 Posted January 18 19 minutes ago, hiflier said: ........But I do have an idea for here. How about we all get our heads together and find the name of a geneticist within the USFWS? Maybe one at their forensics lab in Ashland, Oregon. Any harm in doing that? Not asking anyone to do anything. Just find a name, or two, or three? And I'll take it from there. PM incoming........
OntarioSquatch Posted January 23 Posted January 23 US government officials and Tom Delonge supposedly have info that they want to share. So far they’ve claimed that Bigfoot, UFOs, and the paranormal are all related in some ways and that it’s not fully understood what’s going on. According to Dr. John B Alexander, we may be dealing with something that’s at least as complicated as cancer. I think they also claimed that the US has had good reasons for keeping the stuff a secret, and that a lot of it is considered to be a threat to national security.
Backdoc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 7 hours ago, OntarioSquatch said: US government officials and Tom Delonge supposedly have info that they want to share. So far they’ve claimed that Bigfoot, UFOs, and the paranormal are all related in some ways and that it’s not fully understood what’s going on. According to Dr. John B Alexander, we may be dealing with something that’s at least as complicated as cancer. I think they also claimed that the US has had good reasons for keeping the stuff a secret, and that a lot of it is considered to be a threat to national security. I don't buy it. But if they are right, I would be afraid to leave the house or start my car.
Huntster Posted January 23 Posted January 23 7 hours ago, OntarioSquatch said: .......they’ve claimed that Bigfoot, UFOs, and the paranormal are all related in some ways and that it’s not fully understood what’s going on. According to Dr. John B Alexander, we may be dealing with something that’s at least as complicated as cancer........ 15 minutes ago, Backdoc said: I don't buy it. But if they are right, I would be afraid to leave the house or start my car. Occam's razor. The most likely way that these three (and every other) phenomena are related is in the way that people blow the most simple and reasonable explanations way out of the realm of potential reality. Glickman: http://www.photekimaging.com/Support/rptcol2.pdf Quote ..........Let’s assume that manufactured reports will be uniformly distributed across the population. If the rate of manufactured reports is constant, then the frequency of reports should correlate to population. To some degree, this is seen in Group B. There may be other unidentified influencing factors such as mean media exposure to Bigfoot, which may influence the density of manufacturing. The author speculates that Group A and Group B represent different phenomenon. Group B may represent manufactured reports because of the correlation to population, whereas Group A may represent a different phenomenon because of its correlation to population density. The author hypothesizes that if Green’s data is the superposition of multiple phenomena that this is the expected result..........
guyzonthropus Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Huntster....practice practice practice! "At least as complicated as cancer". What does that even mean? in terms different types? How to deal with the various forms? The causes? Potential cures?
Huntster Posted February 10 Posted February 10 50 minutes ago, guyzonthropus said: ........"At least as complicated as cancer". What does that even mean? in terms different types? How to deal with the various forms? The causes? Potential cures? Dunno. That was supposedly Dr. John Alexander's statement. I assume that the different types, various forms, remission and resurgence, different results in different people, etc are all oart of the complications he refers to. And I suspect he's correct, especially in the psychological aspects of the phenomenons among peoples around the world, who are also "as complicated as cancer" with regard to cultures, languages, religions, etc. Quote Huntster....practice practice practice!......... Practice what?
OntarioSquatch Posted February 10 Posted February 10 5 hours ago, guyzonthropus said: Huntster....practice practice practice! "At least as complicated as cancer". What does that even mean? in terms different types? How to deal with the various forms? The causes? Potential cures? I think he meant that such phenomena (e.g. Bigfoot, UFOs, and psychic ability) are currently difficult to understand.
JumboJimJabrony Posted October 21 Posted October 21 One things that's important to understand is the USG Is not a unified monolith sharing intelligence and information openly among the various entities and agencies. It's the reason there is no unified finger print database. DOD will want a set and then the FBI will want their own set and then if you take a job with DOE they way want their own set. They'll each take a set but won't share. It's odd but it's how they operate. Is their likely some back corner somewhere where information about bigfoot has been cataloged and filed away? Sure, I'm willing to bet. But that doesn't mean that the USG in terms of the various members of the entities acting in all areas know or care about it even if it's pertinent information. Personally, I could see there being efforts to maintain control of information in regards to something like this only because the phenomenon isn't under control or easily explainable. In the book "the locals" there's mention of goings on like this which I find to be fascinating. I'm really just spewing a stream of consciousness but this question came up for me recently and these were my thoughts. 1
Recommended Posts