Brian Posted October 28, 2022 Share Posted October 28, 2022 Here in Florida they are smaller then what the west coast is ! And you have to take in to consideration they have to grow up! if you are a member you should be able to look back and look at pictures I posted ! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7.62 Posted October 28, 2022 Share Posted October 28, 2022 3 hours ago, Huntster said: Maybe bigfeet are feral people? This horror movie has them as feral people . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 28, 2022 Admin Author Share Posted October 28, 2022 1 hour ago, Huntster said: Well, that's what I'd assume, but those DNA science guys *proved* that Zana (described to look just like Patty) was "100% human", thus she was a 100% feral human. It's science, Dude. But yeah, I have a lot of problems accepting this as 100% human". Probably will get some hate mail for saying this. But Patty looks more like a Gorilla to me than a human. Other than being bipedal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 28, 2022 Admin Author Share Posted October 28, 2022 More…. Report of small tracks in the Nordegg area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Catmandoo Posted October 28, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 28, 2022 (edited) They start out just like us..........small. Parental units teach them but they make mistakes and leave tracks. The back story is that I was out for a Sunday drive exploring an area that I was introduced to as a child in the late 60's. I parked at a spot over 3,000' in elevation. Changed coffee and wandered around. About 50' from my vehicle, I found a trackway of small feet leading downhill. Elegant prints with very little heel strike and good lift off at toes. I improvised a measuring device in the way of a 'craft stick' with metric markings. The larger lines are centimeter divisions. The craft stick is about 4 1/2" long / 115 mm. It is light weight and rigid. I was on site for 2 days to monitor print degradation overnight. Morning sun angle was good for toe interpretation. The slope was on a hill, about 12 degrees. Compound slope going downhill and not flat. Soft dirt next to gravel. Rigid type tape measure was awkward to use because it would fall over. There is an image with the tape measure and a dangling small tape. I dangled the small tape above the ground to give a vertical reference to the slope of the hill / tracks. The print below the little tape is from my shoe. I monitored the site over time. I interfered with their hunting. 1 to 3 trail cameras did not produce results. The images are old. Scanned from transparencies except the 1st image with craft stick and scale. Edited October 28, 2022 by Catmandoo more text 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JKH Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 FYI for anyone finding small foots: "she found clearly defined footprints of what she believes is a baby Bigfoot that walked through a mud puddle outside her home. The prints are "almost human, but they're not because of the furry hair on their foot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madison5716 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 On 10/26/2022 at 8:50 PM, norseman said: Dr. Meldrum made fun of Will’s find. Which is odd. I get that the 20 inch track is the safe bet. But not all tracks are gonna adults or males. Exactly! I'm sure Will likely felt the same way when Cliff told us a 72-inch stride was human. Sometimes the experts are just wrong. No one's right 100% of the time, especially when lots of folks - real investigators and kooks alike - want your attention and validation. I personally think the sasquatches bank on the little prints going unnoticed since they are the same size as ours. But SOME of us know what's up! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyzonthropus Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 Do the smaller prints show the tarsal break. One might expect that to be perhaps more pronounced it that the wee youngsters are apt to do a good deal more climbing. As for that movie, when the crazy gas station dude tells you to take the "old logging road nobody used anymore" into Canada after dark, that's gotta come with at least a couple red flags... "Hey! That's a great idea! Promise not to tell anyone we went that way?" I could just see an ivestigator scratching his head..... "The prints are 7" long but the stride is 76" long" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted November 5, 2022 BFF Patron Share Posted November 5, 2022 On 10/27/2022 at 7:05 PM, norseman said: Probably will get some hate mail for saying this. But Patty looks more like a Gorilla to me than a human. Other than being bipedal. Damn that's one crafty gorilla~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted November 5, 2022 BFF Patron Share Posted November 5, 2022 (edited) On 10/28/2022 at 9:48 PM, JKH said: FYI for anyone finding small foots: "she found clearly defined footprints of what she believes is a baby Bigfoot that walked through a mud puddle outside her home. The prints are "almost human, but they're not because of the furry hair on their foot." One could probably conduct experiments with the little banty roosters with feathery feet I suppose to simulate hair https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ2BiqJgJkc&t=7s Be careful of that 72 inch human-like stride though Edited November 5, 2022 by bipedalist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 On 10/27/2022 at 10:05 PM, norseman said: Probably will get some hate mail for saying this. But Patty looks more like a Gorilla to me than a human. Other than being bipedal. No hate here. I am more inclined to believe in an undocumented non human being in the film. The logical choice is a tall man in an awesome suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted November 5, 2022 Admin Author Share Posted November 5, 2022 29 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: No hate here. I am more inclined to believe in an undocumented non human being in the film. The logical choice is a tall man in an awesome suit. When you look at how the head connects to the shoulders and is slung way down and forward? Like a Gorilla? I don’t think it’s a man in a suit. It’s not the logical choice. It’s the popular choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 The front slope of the head doesn't allow for the vertical room needed for a Human forehead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, norseman said: When you look at how the head connects to the shoulders and is slung way down and forward? Like a Gorilla? I don’t think it’s a man in a suit. It’s not the logical choice. It’s the popular choice. Respectfully disagree. No other credible examples makes hoax the logical choice. Like I said, never bought into the relic human theory. Undocumented North American ape more believable. Edited November 5, 2022 by Patterson-Gimlin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 1 hour ago, hiflier said: The front slope of the head doesn't allow for the vertical room needed for a Human forehead So,what is in the film? Gorilla,relic human or man in an altered suit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts