Guest Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 I think I am 100% believing the BBB reports.
Guest RedRatSnake Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 generate attention for themselves. Hi My ear was ringing and it directed me right here ~ Tim ~
Guest Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 I think you are right tim. Sadly, I think that may be the case.
gigantor Posted September 13, 2011 Admin Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) ::peace out:: :lol: I1, FYI, "peace out" went out of style in the early 90's along with CDs, Vanilla Ice and tank tops. The cool way to sign off these days must be "text friendly", because of the small KBs on mobile devices. Cya! Edited September 13, 2011 by gigantor
Incorrigible1 Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 Funny that. I use my phone to speak upon, as Alexander Graham Bell intended, Had I wished to text, I'd have bought the Samuel Morse version.
gigantor Posted September 13, 2011 Admin Posted September 13, 2011 Me too, I'm just alerting you to the cool trend
Guest Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 Would any of those proposing that the Ketchum Paper is a hoax care to explain just what is in it for Dr Ketchum or her co-authors to hoax anything given the significant damage to their professional reputations that would occur as a result? I just don't think that there's that much going on right now that's generating a lot of new web traffic. I'm sure that BF are still being spoted, tracks photo-ed, etc...it's just not making the "news".
Guest Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 Tim, This is absolutely 100% not a hoax. Not even close. Yes everybody's entitled to their opinion I know, and you're entitled to yours but you and everyone else will soon see what's up. DR
gigantor Posted September 13, 2011 Admin Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) I don't think the "Ketchum Paper" is a hoax, or that they're trying to hoax anything. I think it's just a case of innocent, naive, exuberant wishful thinking based on promising, yet inconclusive results. i.e. they got overly excited about preliminary results and dropped a few hints. The word got around, hype took over and here we are. It happens all the time. Hope I'm wrong. Edited September 13, 2011 by gigantor
TimB Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) It's the ambiguous things like "soon" that take away credibility. I can't see any reason why one person can't put online and or on screen where exactly the structure is in process. All summer the speculation was the paper is in review. Then a few weeks ago someone says on Coast to Coast that the paper isn't even done yet. Too many trial balloons floated to consider it legitimate. Tim Edited September 13, 2011 by Jodie edited to conform to forum R&G
Guest slimwitless Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) I hope that emoticon means what I think it does. Edited September 13, 2011 by slimwitless
Incorrigible1 Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 I wish somebody would speak some unambiguous truth on the subject.
BobbyO Posted September 13, 2011 SSR Team Posted September 13, 2011 I'm breaking my read only policy for a one-time posting- this is just the best organized hoax in this arena yet. There's no reason someone can't say where exactly things were in the process. The fact that they keep back-tracking and changing the date. It's just a really-well engineered hoax and there is absolutely NO proof otherwise. Not even any definite hear-say. Hats off to the organizers. They earned their attention. Tim B. You've done that 97 times then..
Guest Posted September 13, 2011 Posted September 13, 2011 It'll happen when it happens and all the gossip and specualtion is pointless. How's that for unambiguous?
Recommended Posts