Forums

Thanks so much for posting the link ........................... I couldn't figure it out ............. you are good! What did you find interesting about the video. It was interesting how it calmly walked off after being seen by a group of humans. It had no fear and we don't hear many reports like this in regards to our North American bigfoot. The bigfoot that I was fantastically lucky enough to see, stayed put, stared and didn't walk off until I took my eyes off of it. I hope all on the forum get to see one sometime.  

Me as well. I think its amazing they don’t seem to target us! I have been told the same thing!🤣

True. But apparently orcas do, too, and I didn't know that before today.\     I must be Neanderthal..........or autistic...........or both...............

New (to me) about orca culture.    

I’d say these are good points but ultimately the wrong question being asked.      We should assume any hoax requires destroying any evidence it’s a hoax.  We think that’s the suit and it is.  But, it’s also any photo or film of any dry run.  It’s a given the suit would be destroyed immediately or soon after the PGF money tour once they knew it wouldn’t be needed again.    Whatever the method, we can all believe-an accept -the suit would get destroyed.   the real question:  why would ANYONE involved in a hoax record evidence On Film of a hoax?     There is nothing about this point making any sense.  No one involved in any hoax would film any “dry run” of such a hoax and would destroy such a film right away if a pre-PGF would be needed.  No one developing such a film would sneak off and make a secret copy.  There would be no need to.  It’s a job.  Develop the film.  If the film was developed in secret like the PFG likely was the developer doesn’t keep a copy around.   Makes no sense.   Further they are trying to hide the fact they did a favor for someone in sneaky development.     if Bob Heironimus came forward back in the day claiming to be the man in the suit AND TOOK PHOTOS of the suit that is a story with promise.   We might assume he might photograph  the Patty suit on his person or displayed in the trunk of his car. Weird behavior from a loyal friend who they “knew could be trusted” but at least it makes sense.   We could further verify the photos by the fact  the suit on the photos clearly matches.     I can buy the concept Hoaxers doing a trial run to make sure the hoax looks convincing.   Unlikely but let’s assume.   But they would destroy the such a film right away.  There wouldn’t be copies made as there would be no need for a copy. Any original wouldn’t be let out of the site of the hoaxers.  They don’t keep it around or let come copy float around.   The Question has an answer.  No one gong to the trouble of a PGF level-film and allow a smoking gun to hang around.  I don’t care if it’s Kitkaze’s Patty suit under glass nonsense or a film of a “dry run”