Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.5k
- posts
-
- Bigfoot myth or monster?
- By Backdoc,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By MIB,
-
- 18k
- posts
-
- 129.4k
- posts
-
- By xspider1,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By Abqnurse,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 327
- posts
-
- Idaho 1902 - Idaho's Wild Man
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.5k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- Blue Ridge Bigfoot Fest - September 26, 2026
- By OkieFoot,
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By Iambrianne,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 866
- posts
-
- 73
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 86.9k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.4k
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
- 903
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- JKH
- Incorrigible1
- Backdoc
- FuzzBucket
- bipedalist
- jameskrav
- gigantor
- MIB
- FieldAnomaly
- Apeman
- xspider1
- NormalJake
- BrianTheLion
- Ljlep40
- RedHawk454
- VAfooter
- OldMort
- norseman
- BigTime1967
- BeachFoot
- PBeaton
- Huntster
-
Latest Posts
-
By Backdoc · Posted
Could be. I’d say the older I get the longer I go without seeing a debunking of the PGF. Could be a hoax. But the longer I go without seeing a strong hoax case being made the more it suggests Roger and Bob may have really “got the sucker” One can be real but the Government involvement is not required. -
-
By MIB · Posted
I'm not there .. because of what I've seen first hand .. but I am becoming jaded regarding the notion we're going to get "proof", regarding the idea that bigfoot will someday be something in the biology text rather than in the mythology text. It is almost as if there is something "funny" going on. Even if the goal is merely to understand better rather than to prove, the options seem to be a) give up or b) plow forward despite lack of hope. I think maybe this is why some of the old researchers eventually turned down the woo rabbit hole .. because they know something and can't prove it, why Todd Standing seemingly tried to create evidence when he could not find it, why .. etc. -
By RedHawk454 · Posted
The older I get the more and more i fall into the belief that Sasquatch is likely a myth I'm still open to Sasquatch being a real flesh and blood creature that the US government is covering up their existence -
By MIB · Posted
That is an insightful question. I saw what I saw, I know what I know. Though convincing to me, because I was there observing, not merely hearing the account afterwards, I would be disappointed if anyone looked at my sighting accounts as anything other than "just another anecdote" so far as "proof" goes. I don't even have a picture to back them up with. That makes them, frankly, pretty weak sauce so far as proving anything at all. I hope that for someone already convinced by some other body of evidence, they are interesting and maybe educational, maybe fill in some gaps. At least for a couple of the tracks I do have pictures. They are open to interpretation. For interested individuals, they might well be interesting / educational, but I have no delusions that those constitute proof either. They'd barely make the grade as serious evidence. Same for the audio. All are most useful as interesting data points for those who are interested. They should never be thought of as proof or even as strong evidence. Does this make sense? I hope so, hope it gives some context for how I see my own meager "offerings."
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
MIB
9 -
2
norseman
6 -
3
Incorrigible1
4 -
4
Backdoc
4 -
5
xspider1
4
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,554
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
Iambrianne
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics91.4k
-
Total Posts995.7k
-