Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 203k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.5k
      posts
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      14.7k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      128.9k
      posts
      • FLY
    5. 20.5k
      posts
      • Redbone
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      325
      posts
    8. 10.2k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      16
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      70
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 555
      posts
    6. 54
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      85.7k
      posts
      • VAfooter
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.3k
      posts
      • Incorrigible1
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      902
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • Limited Hangout
      • Littlewing
      • FLY
      • VAfooter
      • DrPSH
      • OkieFoot
      • Trogluddite
      • GenesRUs
      • Northern Lights
      • Twist
      • PBeaton
      • Huntster
      • JKH
  • Latest Posts

    • norseman
      I agree.   From Clovis first to UAPs? It’s just dumb and egotistical. And it’s not how science is supposed to work.   The men in the ivory tower just call people rubes and laugh at them. Until they are confronted face first into a brick wall with FACTS.    I am not saying that every claim is valid and I am not saying there is a fair share of quackery out there. There absolutely is.   I have seen cow tracks and coyote vocalizations presented as Bigfoot evidence on this very forum.   But you cannot throw the baby out with the bath water.        
    • OnlyASize12
    • socialBigfoot
      There's a ton of research on the concept of "motivated skepticism". It's basically the idea that we perceive more favorably any new information that supports our current opinion. So a motivated skeptic about the existence of Bigfoot will not give much consideration to any evidence that contradicts his prior belief, no matter how objectively good that evidence might be. Same would hold true for those already convinced that Bigfoot exist. This appears to happen subconsciously. Even the “scofftic” (to use norseman's term) could be unaware of his motivated skepticism.    Here's a cool academic paper on motivated skepticism for those interested. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280743835_Motivated_Skepticism_Use_of_Differential_Decision_Criteria_for_Preferred_and_Nonpreferred_Conclusions   True skepticism is difficult to realize. It's like our brains are always pushing us to validate what we think we already know.  
    • norseman
      Wrong field, but a great explanation on closed minded scientists.   Dr. Gary Nolan   https://youtube.com/shorts/-Tzw21EcC8c?si=o4e6ah3F0C6QmpDq
    • Backdoc
      The problem is we don't have agreed upon, well-defined terms which are universally understood.     I have no problem with the term "Skeptic" but it must be defined as to what kind of skeptic.  What do we mean by skeptic?  What do we mean by believer?  How do we define those who are somewhere in the middle who might lean skeptic or lean believer?    Generically, I would think a skeptic as someone who just doesn't think Bigfoot has been proven to be real at least to them.  A believer might believe bigfoot exists and yet thinks the PGF is a hoax.  Maybe they think the PGF is real, but the Memorial Day footage is a hoax.  There are diff degrees on what people believe and don't' believe.     It's not perfect but we have to at least attempt to use labels in the discussion of the Bigfoot issues.    BTW a skeptic can be open minded, and a hardline believer might change their mind. 
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      20
    2. 2
      norseman
      norseman
      8
    3. 3
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      7
    4. 4
      Madison5716
      Madison5716
      7
    5. 5
      Huntster
      Huntster
      4
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,512
    • Most Online
      2,678

    healthyoctopus
    Newest Member
    healthyoctopus
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.1k
    • Total Posts
      982k
×
×
  • Create New...