Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 202.9k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.5k
      posts
      • JKH
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      13.6k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      128.9k
      posts
      • norseman
    5. 20.5k
      posts
      • Madison5716
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      325
      posts
    8. 10.1k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      16
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      66
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 535
      posts
    6. 53
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      85.2k
      posts
      • Huntster
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.3k
      posts
      • Huntster
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      902
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • JustCurious
      • Wolfjewel
      • LocalGayCryptid
      • Incorrigible1
      • JKH
      • BigTime1967
      • Doug
      • Backdoc
      • BlackRockBigfoot
  • Latest Posts

    • Catmandoo
      It would be interesting to follow the global spread of yams. Thor Heyerdahl's theories were not universally accepted after his voyage. Polynesian navigators easily crossed back and forth. Genetic and linguistic research reveals that Heyerdahl's theories don't work. The modern version of Heyerdahl's voyage makes for a nice movie ( except for the parrot ). I have not checked on the travels of yams to see if they went east from South America to Africa and Australia. Yams could have traveled west to Australia and islands.
    • MIB
      The first Native Americans did not bring Clovis technology with them.    We know that there were settlements like Rimrock Draw cave in Oregon that predate Clovis by a good margin.    I know a photographer from the dig.   As of now they have solid dates to 18500 BP and there is a smattering of deeper material that hasn't been dated yet.   The fossilized trackway at White Sands, NM goes back to about 23,000 BP.   There are other sites being excavated that may prove older than either.    Nothing, though, in the way of settlement residuals that exceed 30K years and certainly nothing matching the proposed / purported mammoth bones said by some to be human-affected dated to 130K years.   For the moment, it looks like Clovis did not derive from Solutrean technology from Europe as proposed, it really was near-parallel development.     If Clovis tech were descended from Solutrean tech, we have another problem because there is no DNA in any existent Native American population dating from the same rough time, none.   This means that somehow the Asian-descended "Native" tribes would have had to have understood and adopted the Solutrean technology yet killed every single European -sourced person so that there is ZERO DNA passed along.      If Clovis technology was imported, it was into a continent already peopled by those using other technologies.    Possible.   Also possible it was derived in place .. that improbable but not impossible parallel evolution idea.   South America is a different puzzle.    One piece interesting to me is the yam / sweet potato.   Apparently it is indigenous to the south pacific islands.   I is maybe reasonable that some could have washed up on South America and taken root, but if so, why do the south American natives use exactly the same word as the south pacific islanders for it?   This points to earlier contact than we currently think possible.   We could ask why the Olmec heads' features appear sub Saharan African.   Coincidence of artistry or .. familiarity with people from continents that shouldn't theoretically have been able to contact each other.     We have to be a bit cautious about timelines though.   A friend years back was sure that South American and African people migrated back and forth overland before the mid Atlantic Ridge took over.   Hah hah, missed by a couple hundred million years.   Oops.
    • georgerm
    • norseman
      My viewpoint is that they are NOT the first Homo Sapiens to enter the Americas. And its not even close.   They do do beautiful fluting and stone tool work.   Another thing to keep in mind is that they could have been here for 100,000 years before they invented Clovis technology.    Science seems to think they brought the new technology with them from Asia. Which may or may not be true.   They do this with Europeans as well. Like for example the Corded Ware culture. Its never clear exactly whom these people were and what their relationship is to modern humans living in the area.
    • georgerm
      "How long was CLOVIS FIRST jammed down our throats? How many scientists careers were destroyed for simply reporting the truth? And it wasn’t just a little wrong…. It was vastly grossly WRONG," Norseman.    "It's been a while since I thought about the Clovis Points and the Clovis society so I had to brush up on the topic and here is what I found," georgerm.   The Clovis culture is an archaeological culture from the Paleoindian period of North America, spanning around 13,050 to 12,750 years Before Present (BP).[1] The type site is Blackwater Draw locality No. 1 near Clovis, New Mexico, where stone tools were found alongside the remains of Columbian mammoths in 1929.[2] Clovis sites have been found across North America.[1] The most distinctive part of the Clovis culture toolkit are Clovis points,[3] which are projectile points with a fluted, lanceolate shape.   Norse, what is your viewpoint on the Clovis Society?
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      8
    2. 2
      BC witness
      BC witness
      6
    3. 3
      norseman
      norseman
      6
    4. 4
      Huntster
      Huntster
      6
    5. 5
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      6
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,510
    • Most Online
      2,678

    healthyoctopus
    Newest Member
    healthyoctopus
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      77.2k
    • Total Posts
      978.5k
×
×
  • Create New...