Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.4k
- posts
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- 360 trail camera
- By norseman,
-
- 17.6k
- posts
-
- 129.1k
- posts
-
- By xspider1,
-
- 20.5k
- posts
-
- By BobbyO,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 326
- posts
-
- International 1904 - India - The Tiger People
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.4k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By healthyoctopus,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 653
- posts
-
- Oregon 1976 - Bigfoot Researcher's Film "Pretty Good"
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 59
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 86.4k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.3k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 902
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- JKH
- GenesRUs
- Northern Lights
- scoobiestkn
- Bonehead74
- Incorrigible1
- BobbyO
-
Latest Posts
-
By Backdoc · Posted
The “film” simplified only if the “Film” was shot pre-dating the PGF does the film have any skeptic significance. if the film (1966 era) was Shot After the PGF there could be many reasons for this. Some may become known and many theories are possible. But they do nothing to help the skeptic cause. If it was shot after the PGF what skeptic would care? they have all their hopes in the dry-run basket. It’s all or nothing finally I’m curious what the “Boeing development” does to the credibility of this “film” if it turns out Boeing had no on site development possible. -
-
By AlaskaDreamer · Posted
As does Outlaw Country, who is a friend of S.I. -
By Backdoc · Posted
I'm not saying it would be easy to do in or out of a suit. Yet, it wouldn't be hard to imagine any hoaxer getting familiar with the path I might run. A hoaxer also might have home field advantage where they would know the hillside and area involved. I would expect whatever the case they would not be running in an area they knew nothing about. Unless it was an obstacle course, I would think most typical hillsides would be manageable even in a suit. -
By Trogluddite · Posted
The most important part of that video is on the screen capture. I first heard of this video on the TV show Bigfoot: Legend Meets Science. At that time, and through the first few years of Finding Bigfoot, I had at most a mild curiosity about the topic. I always understood that the subject in the MDF was running across a hillside along a random path through the underbrush, rocks, brambles, downed logs, and other things that litter nature. If it was running along a well-worn hiking trail in the middle of the day, that suggests to me that it was a human in a suit participating in a hoax (whether known or unknown to those filming it). I don't recall the Bigfoot: Legend Meets Science book or tv show making clear that the subject of the film was running on a hiking trail.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
VAfooter
9 -
2
norseman
4 -
3
Trogluddite
4 -
4
Incorrigible1
3 -
5
TD-40
2
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,512
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
healthyoctopus
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics87.9k
-
Total Posts991.2k
-