Forums
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 2.8k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By danthemandmv,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 195k
- posts
-
- New PGF Research
- By Huntster,
-
- 20k
- posts
-
- Selkirk Outfitters
- By norseman,
-
- 5.5k
- posts
-
- 127.4k
- posts
-
- By larryzed,
-
- 19.6k
- posts
-
- By larryzed,
-
- 382
- posts
-
- Color and imagery
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 308
- posts
-
- California 1936 - Wild Man Proves Only Nudist Addict
- By Huntster,
-
- 8.2k
- posts
-
- 998
- posts
-
- Estes Park Bigfoot Days - April 14 & 15, 2023
- By Doodler,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 51
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 62
- posts
-
- 23
- posts
-
- By WV FOOTER,
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 67.1k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 24.8k
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
- 871
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
-
Who was online
- 7.62
- Northern Lights
- Akira
- Twist
- Incorrigible1
- SomeCreepinaVan
- EnglishRose
- Soul-Sender
- norseman
- Bill
- Wolfjewel
- JKH
- HoosierCreeks
-
Latest Posts
-
-
By Huntster · Posted
It's the same principle as legal court, but in reverse. The state must prove its case beyond. reasonable doubt, but the defense only needs to inject doubt. But I'm not a lawyer or scientist, and I'm not on a jury being used as a player in their game. I can use my own judgement, even to the point of "hunting" a sasquatch. As long as I don't harm it, there is no way I can be accused of wrongdoing.They can only ridicule, which has no power over me. -
By norseman · Posted
It’s simple. We lack physical evidence. It we found a fossil of a large primate in North America? And the fossil was relatively young? That would change the narrative IMHO. (Barring any ulterior motives) The skeptics retreat behind this lack of evidence. It’s their sanctuary. So Patty HAS TO BE a man in a suit, right? Because if there was something out there or was there? They would have found evidence by now, right? I watch people like Michael Shermer….. and the subject could be any cryptozoology creature. His argument is almost always identical. Attack the character of witnesses, point to natural explanations or point to hoaxes. -
By wiiawiwb · Posted
Everyone one today does have a cellphone camera but only a handful of people are photographers or know how to use it in a woodland setting. Here is a picture I've posted before. It is of a deer I saw while at the summit of a mountain. I took about a dozen pictures using every trick I knew to get a clear picture of it's head. No luck. Two decades ago, if I had my 35mm "real" camera (Minolta) with me, I would have undoubtedly been able to focus on the deer's head in the snap of a finger and gotten a clear picture. Not with cellphone cameras of today. In my opinion, they're made for parties and pictures at home--not wildlife with a half-dozen layers of tree branches between you and it. -
By wiiawiwb · Posted
Bill Munn's work is a veritable thesus on the PGF. Gigantofootecus and Sweaty Yeti have also done groundbreaking work. Have you reviewed their work here on BFF especially those related to Patty's proportions? Look for ASH ratio and arm proportions. Some of GF's work dates back to ~ November 2005, in BFF 1.0 archives, which is about when he began posting here, if memory serves me. I'd say a very strong case has been made by all three. Can you name me anyone who has successfully explained Patty's inhuman ASH ratio and Gigantofootecus' photogrammetric analysis?
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
Incorrigible1
16 -
2
Madison5716
9 -
3
PNWexplorer
8 -
4
MIB
5 -
5
Northern Lights
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,220
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
gas giant
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics36.9k
-
Total Posts907.2k
-