Forums

Very wise on both your parts!

No chance at all according to Munn's who examined the new film and determined it to be Kodachrome II stock manufactured in 1966. I despise AI and have stopped trusting anything...

What are the chances this new Patty film is AI? It seems conspicuous to me that they wait this long after the Morris-Bob H debacle to produce a “new” film?   I will openly admit that AI is pretty dang good these days and I have stopped trusting new film completely.    

This is the best example I can think of to explain these "smoking gun" claims.   It could be a suit in a glass case.  It could be claims of multiple confessions that are said to be recorded.   Same thing.   I don't know the content of tihs new smoking gun video.  Yet, I will suspect this time next year we will have long moved off it it as one more nothing burger in the long line of notihng burgers.                 Funny thing Morris and Kitkaze being mentioned in the same post.   Kit has mention many times about the Morris suit as an attempt to throw hair in the soup. The idea was if he could poison the meal with one thing we wouldn't want to eat it.  He would promote Morris and even gladly posted a still pic to prove the fact he had in fact interviewed Morris personally.  Years ago on the forums I asked him words to this effect:  Do you beleive any suit used at bluff creek was in any way a Morris suit?  You intereviewed the guy.  Tell us, what do you think?   Like so many isuses, when you ask Kit a direct Q he flops aournd and changed the subject often. Then finally he did admit any Patty suit was not a Morris suit.  He had posted words to this effect as I recall:  I think Morris is really good person who is just mistaken  No, I dont think the PGF suit is any morris suit.     As far as the Morris recration (walking ewok Bob Heironimus) If you have to hide it there is probably a reason.   

I've learned that I don't care to ever watch another minute of the smug Hairy Man Road. His 15 seconds of fame were more than enough.