Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 202.9k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.5k
      posts
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      13.8k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      128.9k
      posts
      • Trogluddite
    5. 20.5k
      posts
      • MIB
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      325
      posts
    8. 10.1k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      16
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      67
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 540
      posts
    6. 53
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      85.3k
      posts
      • VAfooter
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.3k
      posts
      • Huntster
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      902
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • idlehour30
      • Snoho
      • MIB
      • norseman
      • GenesRUs
      • VAfooter
      • Backdoc
      • Incorrigible1
      • PBeaton
      • Ljlep40
      • Patterson-Gimlin
      • OldMort
      • GinjaNinja
      • georgerm
      • NormalJake
      • 1980squatch
      • cmknight
      • Trogluddite
      • OkieFoot
      • Wolfjewel
      • BeachFoot
  • Latest Posts

    • MIB
      BP is "before present".   The earliest Clovis points date to about 13,000 years ago.   Having sites in North America 10,000 years before Clovis nullifies the whole "Clovis first" paradigm.   Along with that idea was populating North America through an ice free corridor in the Cordilleran ice sheet.   There was no ice free corridor 23,000 years ago.   This more or less forces the populating of N.A. to have been by boat along the coast following the "kelp highway" rather than overland.   Most of the artifacts from that route are under hundreds of feet of seawater today since the melting of the continental glaciers has pushed sea levels up that much.      There were at least 4 periods in the pleistocene where there was a Bering land bridge rather than open water but we don't have any generally accepted evidence of human occupation going back to those earlier 3 periods.   For now, the suggested, speculative very early "stuff" (100K years BP) seems to stand alone with no supporting evidence and most likely is wishful thinking, not evidence of human occupation.    Possibility of 30K years could be inferred though.   The important part is that Clovis technology was NOT the earliest in North America, people were here before Clovis technology was developed.    Most likely, also, since there were already people here, Clovis, despite having strong similarity to Solutrean technology, is probably a North American development.   With people already here, there should be strong genetic connection if the technology were imported.      
    • Incorrigible1
      23,000 Before Present (now).   "Science" actively discouraged speculation of human activity in N America prior to approximately 13,000 Before Present (Clovis culture). Such speculation led to careers being damaged, and was suppressed.   The confirmation that the White Sands fossil footprints at 23,000 BP helped dash the stranglehold of the "None Before Clovis" dogma. Real science freed to pursue discovery of prehistoric N American human activity. 
    • georgerm
      read it once and thanks... will read it again and thanks for the details...   "NM goes back to about 23,000 BP..."      What does 23,000 bP stand for and how does it relate to the Clovis culture? 
    • JKH
      Happy new year, thanks for sharing and well done! 
    • Bigtex
      Thanks Norseman and Happy New Year to all including our hairy friends!   My friend Chester Moore did some interviews with me last Spring and ended up doing a YouTube with them, I've always been private about my hobby lol, but he did a good job.....check it out:)    
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      12
    2. 2
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      11
    3. 3
      Huntster
      Huntster
      7
    4. 4
      BC witness
      BC witness
      6
    5. 5
      norseman
      norseman
      6
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,509
    • Most Online
      2,678

    healthyoctopus
    Newest Member
    healthyoctopus
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      77.6k
    • Total Posts
      978.9k
×
×
  • Create New...