Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 202.9k
- posts
-
- RIP Frank Kaneaster
- By norseman,
-
- 20.5k
- posts
-
- 13.9k
- posts
-
- 128.9k
- posts
-
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 20.5k
- posts
-
- By Madison5716,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 325
- posts
-
- Iowa 1889 - Wildman Kills Farmer
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.1k
- posts
-
- SC EP:1220 The Fort Benning Incident
- By BFFbot,
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- 16
- posts
-
- Decent Buck
- By NathanFooter,
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By healthyoctopus,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 67
- posts
-
- Ecological Niche Modeling and Sasquatch Distribution
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 542
- posts
-
- North Carolina 1976 - State Law Protects Bigfoot
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 53
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 85.3k
- posts
-
- By norseman,
-
- 25.3k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 902
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- JKH
- Doug
- norseman
- Limited Hangout
- Huntster
- Ljlep40
- jacocamo81288
- Incorrigible1
- gerrykleier
- FLY
- Trogluddite
- night912
- NormalJake
- GinjaNinja
- churchill
- Wolfjewel
- VAfooter
- BigTime1967
- BlackRockBigfoot
- waterman18
-
Latest Posts
-
-
By bigfootsociety · Posted
Frank passed away on 10/26/25. I got to spend a few hours with him in July of 2025. Broke me to hear he had passed. If you had experiences with Frank doing Bigfoot research or know individuals that I might want to talk to about that then please email me ASAP at bigfootsociety@gmail.com I am putting together a tribute episode to Frank on the show; this has been cleared through Frank’s widow. -
By xspider1 · Posted
Good topic, georgerm. I see no other explanation than that they are supernatural, i.e. 'of a manifestation or event attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or, (our) laws of nature'. In the past, I know that it has been the official opinion of the BFF that Bigfoot are a flesh and blood creature, along the same lines as humans, gorillas, giant squid, rhinoceros, etc. etc., many animals of which were initially scorned by the know-it-all mainstream (that denies all of which it does not understand). I don't know if that is still the official BFF stance. However, I see Bigfoot as being different even from those examples. To me, the evidence that they exist, in some dimension, is realistically undeniable. And, I hope that no Bigfoot is ever in a zoo and I really don't think that any current zoo could ever contain one. -
By Huntster · Posted
First, the policy of discouraging discovery can be pinned on dead guys...........policymakers who decided this decades (up to a century or more) ago. Those who finally disclose end up heroes. Secondly, yes, there are piles of issues that government keeps close to its vest. This is both wise and expected, and they can defend those decisions, even if you or I as individuals disagree strongly. Thirdly, yes, disclosure itself is a can of worms that supports continued silence, especially if they think they have morality on their side...........or can make a reasonable stretch toward that defense. Finally, I have actually come to believe that ignorance of these creatures by the vast majority of people IS the wise policy. Do you want to destroy something? Let everybody know it exists. People will screw it up pronto. Guaranteed. -
By norseman · Posted
This may really throw North America history books a curve ball.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
VAfooter
13 -
2
Incorrigible1
12 -
3
MIB
10 -
4
Huntster
7 -
5
georgerm
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,514
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
healthyoctopus
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics77.9k
-
Total Posts979.4k
-