Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.4k
- posts
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- 360 trail camera
- By norseman,
-
- 17.6k
- posts
-
- 129k
- posts
-
- By norseman,
-
- 20.5k
- posts
-
- By BobbyO,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 326
- posts
-
- International 1904 - India - The Tiger People
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.3k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By healthyoctopus,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 653
- posts
-
- Oregon 1976 - Bigfoot Researcher's Film "Pretty Good"
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 58
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 86.4k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.3k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 902
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- NormalJake
- Snoho
- Huntster
- OldMort
- JKH
- VAfooter
- idlehour30
- Incorrigible1
- Trogluddite
- CCW
- Teegunn
- Backdoc
- Ljlep40
- scoobiestkn
-
Latest Posts
-
By Backdoc · Posted
The runner easily ran faster than the 'Bigfoot' in the film. I must be reading this wrong. Are you saying you are under the impression the 'Bigfoot' ran FASTER (?) than the elite sprinter? It didn't. If 'Bigfoot' ran faster than the elite runner there would be little doubt to me this must have been animal and no man in a suit. The runner wasn't even in a suit but running clothes. Now the fact the runner ran faster than the 'Bigfoot' could mean 1) it is a hoaxing man in a suit or 2) It could still be Bigfoot just that Bigfoot cannot outrun the Elite runner. If you are basing this Solely on the incorrect assumption the figure ran faster than the elite runner that is a mistake. Based on other reasons fine. I have not watched the Discovery Channel or whatever on this in years, but I remember the main point. The runner easily ran faster. That is my memory of it anyway. I could have remembered it wrong. Anyone to clarify? -
By TD-40 · Posted
I agree with what has been said about this blurry image and how it does not work well with this sort of analysis. I like PDNA analysis that TT developed but it does not work with this blurry of an image. So we have a subject that ran faster than a Univ. of Washington college athlete across a mountainside with great stride and great acuity, while wearing a big suit (not available at Walmart). And was running high up where nobody would get a good view of it even if they happened to see it. I want to know who these hoaxers are. I conclude that the MD footage was not a hoax. -
By BC witness · Posted
I got out today for a spring bear hunt, got skunked, but had a very nice day in the mountains NE of Boston Bar, in the Fraser Canyon area. The only game I spotted was a few grouse, which aren't open in the spring, of course. There was some fresh bear scat on my chosen trail, but no bruins in sight. My planned loop route turned into an in 'n' out when I found a large rock slide across several hundred metres of the road about 16 km in. Still a good day in some great country, and beautiful spring weather, so I came home refreshed. -
By norseman · Posted
I see the same head shape. The creature up in Washington does appear smaller. Peaked head and heavy brow ridge. -
By Backdoc · Posted
Let me start by saying flat out I never felt this MD Footage was real and always thought it was a hoax. I do have to defend it on TT's analysis: TT's blow-up-skeleton analysis is trying to squeeze too much out of the blurry, ill-defind image. It is asking too much out of the availible image. If the image was pretty well defined then any overlay might be OK. I agree with TT's comments how the figure just happens to run by an open field on a busy holiday full of people. This is not expected for a reclusive, smart animal. Yet, sometimes that is exactly what happens in real life. A good consideration but that is not absolute. People have nature sightings and often have them because the animal in question does come out into the open usually moving into hiding shortly after. I remember seeing this on Discovery/ They correctly asked Q about the very end of the run where it seems the figure lifted a mask off its head. Maybe or maybe not. That makes more sense then having to squeeze out reasons like the idea of the Bigfoot lifting a child bigfoot off the back. TT's deserves credit for trying but it doesn't seem like it is a fair test.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
Trogluddite
10 -
2
norseman
5 -
3
Backdoc
4 -
4
VAfooter
4 -
5
Incorrigible1
3
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,512
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
healthyoctopus
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics87.6k
-
Total Posts990.9k
-