Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 203.8k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.7k
      posts
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      18.3k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      129.5k
      posts
      • RedHawk454
    5. 20.6k
      posts
      • georgerm
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      323
      posts
    8. 10.6k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      17
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.3k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      70
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 1k
      posts
    6. 74
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      87k
      posts
      • Huntster
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.4k
      posts
      • Incorrigible1
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      903
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • Trogluddite
      • norseman
      • Merieliza
      • Backdoc
      • Incorrigible1
      • LocalGayCryptid
      • Buckaloo
      • OldMort
      • Ljlep40
      • RedHawk454
      • Airdale
      • Huntster
      • JKH
      • georgerm
      • Nellie
      • BipedalCurious
      • DrPSH
      • Sculptor
      • xspider1
      • dmaker
      • Sweeney
      • FrankNBeauty
      • JTJOHNSON
      • Fnsdp1
      • Mary
      • langfordbc
      • cmknight
      • AtlantiS
      • BC witness
      • Snoho
      • FieldAnomaly
      • FuzzBucket
  • Latest Posts

    • Huntster
      I'm not presenting this data to exalt the U.N. or any other government. I'm pointing out that these issues have been debated and have some basis in ethics and law, even if not down to the level of Homo hominins........yet..........     My theory is that sasquatches HAVE been "discovered" by government, and they're simply not disclosing it. I base that theory on a number of factors which I've outlined on this forum for quite some time now. And, in accordance with that theory, I believe that one of the main reasons why government has chosen to keep sasquatch existence low key is because they've studied a corpse in the past, have determined that these creatures are, indeed, hominins, and this brings a lot of legal scenarios into play, all the way up to international legalities, they just don't want to go there, I understand why, and I agree.     I understand, even if I'm pretty confident that there is no "army" of government biologists out there in the wilderness. I'm very familiar with them here in Alaska, and in good sasquatch habitat (in Southeast Alaska) you can count state area biologists and federal biologists on the fingers of two hands.     I believe that government is willing to accept sasquatches going extinct, but might have enough knowledge to doubt that they will........and we don't.      
    • norseman
      I certainly DO NOT think everything is a human invention wrapped in a secret.   I think there is plenty of history going back centuries of craft doing spectacular things in the sky. Even as recent as WW2. It wasn't a secret USAF program. The USAF didn't even exist yet.   Something is going on outside of humanity. What it is has been elusive. And there may be not just one clear cut answer.
    • norseman
      And as you and I both know? The UN is all bark and no bite. The miners and loggers continue to go into the jungle and ignore its inhabitants. And the Government continues to look the other way.   Look? Human rights being extended to a cryptid ape man that is not Homo Sapiens is a question to be answered after discovery. We don't know what a Sasquatch is or its relationship to us until we have its genome. So we need to keep the cart behind the horse.   You would think with an army of biologists out preserving eco systems that they would have a full inventory of everything living out there. That's their job, this is what they are paid to do. Maybe they know its out there but they have not convinced the brass. Maybe they don't know its out there at all. Or maybe they all know its out there but flat refuse to give it its rightful place with a scientific classification? Regardless if a tiny club like the Olympic project can document nesting sites and plaster tracks and audio calls and all the rest of the evidence that something called Sasquatch resides out there?   I find it highly dubious that an army of Government biologists have no clue about this phenomenon.   So now we are full circle. Is the Government more than happy to allow Sasquatch to go extinct? If true? That's a conspiracy if I ever heard one and flies in the face of their mission statement.    
    • Huntster
      Thed international community has already addressed the existence of uncontacted Homo sapiens:   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontacted_peoples     A key phrase with this commission is "human rights", which non-humans don't have. Granted, sasquatches aren't likely to be homo sapiens (even though the Zana story proves that such hominins might be), if they are of the genus "Homo", they're "human".   From the above reference:     "State of nature" is. yet another consideration:   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_nature     I submit that governments (American, Russian, Canadian, Chinese, Indian, etc) really don't want to go here, especially if forced to by a tiny population of nearly extinct hominins who want nothing to do with us. 
    • norseman
      I think feral people absolutely are.   Ask the Brazilian government.          
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      22
    2. 2
      Skinwalker13
      Skinwalker13
      13
    3. 3
      norseman
      norseman
      12
    4. 4
      dmaker
      dmaker
      12
    5. 5
      Backdoc
      Backdoc
      9
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,593
    • Most Online
      2,678

    Merieliza
    Newest Member
    Merieliza
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      93k
    • Total Posts
      998.1k
×
×
  • Create New...