Incorrigible1 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 I think he came here expecting a gullible audience. Tables turned. 1
norseman Posted February 11 Admin Posted February 11 2 hours ago, Incorrigible1 said: I think he came here expecting a gullible audience. Tables turned. 2
Doug Posted February 12 Posted February 12 My bigfoot cane beat up your bigfoot. On 2/10/2024 at 8:26 PM, Incorrigible1 said: I think he came here expecting a gullible audience. Tables turned. Exactly.
Twist Posted February 15 Posted February 15 He came here knowing his audience. Some bit, some didn’t. 1
Huntster Posted February 15 Posted February 15 The audience has already seen this comedy act numerous times. We're just wondering if it's the same comedian in a different mask, or if it's a new comedian. 1
OntarioSquatch Posted February 17 Posted February 17 I’d be blown away if LoKee actually believes in bigfoot. 1
CelticKevin Posted February 17 Posted February 17 14 hours ago, OntarioSquatch said: I’d be blown away if LoKee actually believes in bigfoot. I'd be blown away if anyone actually posted some astonishing video as they promised... 1
Frisco85132 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I can't say Bigfoot is MY Bigfoot. I can't say they belong to anyone, though I have throughout my life of interest in Bigfoot seen "The Four Horsemen" all seem to lay claim to, and be jealous of, any evidence brought forth by the others. Dahinden wouldn't share files or info, and seemed to scoff at Krantz, and John Greene hated Dahinden according to Steenburgen....on and on and so it went. Personally, I can't poo poo anyone else's thoughts on the subject. After my face to face encounter in November, 1993, I went from being convinced by evidence that they were real and flesh and blood biological hominem, to knowing they were real. It took me a long time to tell anyone other than my maternal grandfather what had happened because I thought people, especially the police community of which I was a member would ride me mercilessly. But knowing didn't make me take possession of the one I saw, or have the temerity to claim I knew anything more about the creatures than I did before I saw one....I only knew that they were real. Nothing more about lifestyle, culture, habits, etc. Now, regardless of who it is that brings in incontrovertible proof to the public, and the scientific community, I will be almost sad for them because neither they nor the remaining Bigfoot in the area where it was discovered will know another moments peace for a long time. 3
Incorrigible1 Posted May 13 Posted May 13 1 hour ago, karp said: If one follows this forum over the years as I've have, the regulars seem to only want to give creedence to "their" bigfoot and scoff and name call others BF encounters. It's good to know we're in your head. "Name call?" You seem rather delicate. 1
norseman Posted May 13 Admin Posted May 13 2 hours ago, karp said: Even though some of the die hards here labeled the Lokee guy as a troll, this post makes quite a bit of sense. If one follows this forum over the years as I've have, the regulars seem to only want to give creedence to "their" bigfoot and scoff and name call others BF encounters. Of course, the Lokee-types end up getting banned while Norse Man and his troop continues their free reign I will give you credit. You are tenacious. You probably have 50 socket puppet profiles on here. I don’t mind a difference of opinion. But you’re just here in bad faith. You are a troll. 🤷♂️ Which I utterly do not understand. Do something constructive with your life. 👍 1 1
Huntster Posted May 13 Posted May 13 2 hours ago, karp said: .........If one follows this forum over the years as I've have.......... "Years"...........yet only 7 posts? Or are there thousands more under a different name? 1
Huntster Posted May 13 Posted May 13 2 hours ago, karp said: ........the regulars seem to only want to give creedence to "their" bigfoot and scoff and name call others BF encounters.......... I don't have a Bigfoot. Never did. Nobody else does, either, unless they have evidence that withstands scientific review, and even that is exactly as you describe us; personal opinion. Review half a century of silliness regarding the PG film, particularly this: http://www.bigfoot-lives.com/html/report_on_the_film_of_a_suppos.html Quote .........My subjective impressions have oscillated between total acceptance of the Sasquatch on the grounds that the film would be difficult to fake, to one of irrational rejection based on an emotional response to the possibility that the Sasquatch actually exists...........
norseman Posted May 14 Admin Posted May 14 27 minutes ago, karp said: Wow, Norse Man, it took you all of one post to label someone (me) a troll. I'm not one of your imaginary sock puppets but you pretty much proved the point of the OP Until you, Norse Man, have an encounter worthy of discussion, maybe consider bowing out for a while. And no, your "trackway" story is pretty bogus, so give it up One post? I have been interacting with you for years obviously. It’s not very stimulating. Your a one trick pony. 1 1
Recommended Posts