Guest OntarioSquatch Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 I was listening to David Paulides and it seems he strongly believes these Sasquatch are a tribe of people. I did some searching on the internet and found that over the last 150 years there have been skeletons of unknown tribes of people found in places like Wisconsin. The skeletons indicate these people were very large, about 7-9 feet and had odd facial features. Here is some evidence. ^These are a few. Skeletons of giant humans have been found in indian style burials all across the United states. Now, the question is, where do these 8 foot tall people come from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Interesting stuff.......good find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter O. Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Interesting find, for sure. Too bad nobody has tracked these down, though I'm sure it's close to impossible. IIRC there was a poster on this board who said he had actually seen some in a tiny museum before they were removed from the display. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) OS, this has been my pet peave forever now, you hear or read about these finds but try substantiating it with a trip to a museum where they rightfully should be. If your inquiry isn't shunned altogether, you'll likely hear that the remains were sent here or there and are now missing. It's as frustrating as the quest for a live sasquatch or even conclusive DNA for crying out loud. There have been skeletons reportedly found of even taller people; 10-12 ft range, and yet we crowned Robbert Wadlow as the tallest man ever... Yup, PeterO, some have been displayed but get removed--WHYYYYY??? Edited July 15, 2012 by AaronD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 These old news papers are hard to read, but what I've gathered so far is that it's a race of people that are anywhere from 7-12 feet tall. Many are found in burials. They have strange facial features for a normal human and they have sloped heads. Any guesses on what they are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Uh, "sloped heads"? Hmmm, I'd have to say a snowcone maker? Or....oops, I must say it in the tar pit LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 A lot of journalists for newspapers back in the 1800s have been known for making up ******** stories. I wouldn't take these too seriously. Also, the museums not having these skeletons is probably because they were cheated by whoever was trying to sell them these stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) ^The phenominon is not limited to "old time" newspapers. Finds have been made in the last 100 years, such as the Lovelock Cave finds, which have been confirmed as being authentic. http://www.sydhav.no...ts/lovelock.htm http://2012.vidin-on...ock-nevada-usa/ http://www.sydhav.no...elock_skull.jpg The report of two of the primary excavators of Lovelock http://searchworks.s...edu/view/592448 (not the report itself, unfortunately, but proof the report and therefore the excavation exist) Other articles documenting "giants" http://gianthumanskeletons.blogspot.com/2012/05/giant-skeletons-found-on-santa-rosa.html http://garry-nelson....ub/Human-Giants http://www.stevequay...y.TX.giant.html (includes picture of the skull proving that it in fact exists) Edited July 15, 2012 by Mulder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the parkie Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 OS, this has been my pet peave forever now, you hear or read about these finds but try substantiating it with a trip to a museum where they rightfully should be. If your inquiry isn't shunned altogether, you'll likely hear that the remains were sent here or there and are now missing. It's as frustrating as the quest for a live sasquatch or even conclusive DNA for crying out loud. There have been skeletons reportedly found of even taller people; 10-12 ft range, and yet we crowned Robbert Wadlow as the tallest man ever... Yup, PeterO, some have been displayed but get removed--WHYYYYY??? This has been a pet annoyance of mine too in the past. Has anyone heard of anybody recently contacting the Humboldt museum to try to get a look and/or a substantiating pic or video? I would go myself but I am in the UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 This has been a pet annoyance of mine too in the past. Has anyone heard of anybody recently contacting the Humboldt museum to try to get a look and/or a substantiating pic or video? I would go myself but I am in the UK. One of the pics linked to above is OF one of the skulls, and in one of the linked articles, the writer themselves went to the museum and asked about and was shown the skulls. They aren't hidden per se, the museum just doesn't display them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 A+ to Mulder for all that info, thanks! Steve Quayle has a lot of interesting stuff; while some people find his material to be sensational and "iffy", others see him as a whistleblower of sorts. Personally, I think if this stuff were widely known, history would need some ammendments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 ^As an aside, Aaron, I think that's true...probably moreso than you would be willing to imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toejam Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 I've always wondered about those giant skeletons and if they were real. If so, why aren't they taught about in school? Maybe it means they have to rewrite the books and prefer to keep things just the way they are. Truth is truth and that's what should be taught. Lloyd Pye has some interesting concepts about pre humans showing that our ancestors looked nothing like us. Everything You Know Is Wrong....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctcEsyDlq3o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 In 3rd grade, my teacher told me I had a greater imagination than anyone else in the class; which blossomed into creativity and it has served me well in my line of work.....case in point, I doubt anything is beyond the scope of what I'm willing to imagine Having said that, this subject fascinates me to no end BUT I like to seek the facts and not just massage my fantasies. But if there are huge skeletons found--and us bigfooters eagerly accept "signs" that they may be squatches--who is keeping them from us? What power in play is actively securing their place in a cloud of doubt? And why? toejam, you are probably more right on than you even think--we've got this nifty little account of history all slated out and we've taught it in schools for decades, why embarass ourselves and explain why it has to be recalled now? That's a possible answer. I can think of some other areas where propaganda has been passed off as truth as well.....the scariest thing is that the general public is so gullible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) It can only mean one thing then. There is some sort of huge cover up going on. Combined with everything else I've learned about it, I would rank the the Bigfoot phenomenon as one of the greatest mysteries ever. Edited July 15, 2012 by OntarioSquatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts