Guest poignant Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 I guess to have the best of both worlds, forum-type sharing is not appropriate, but rather a one-directional flow of information e.g. like a blog, where the person reporting shares at will, but is not obliged/inclined to respond to queries. Truth is, we all want to hear the latest scoop and developments. The general public doesn't deserve the info, but hey, we're all starving for BF info so what else can we do?
Guest Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 Hoax me once, shame on you. Hoax me twice, and you're going down... One shouldn't poke sticks at lions and not expect to get mauled.
Guest Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 It'd be a bad idea to dress up in a suit and try to hoax an organization that is trying to collect a specimen. Yikes.
Drew Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 (edited) One shouldn't poke sticks at lions and not expect to get mauled. Bigfoot researchers are wild carnivorous predators, that are expected to maul people who try to annoy them? Edited October 11, 2012 by Drew
Guest Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 Bigfoot researchers are wild carnivorous predators, that are expected to maul people who try to annoy them? Drew, you knew perfectly well I did not mean that literally. Don't be deliberately obtuse, it's not becoming of you...
Guest Posted October 12, 2012 Posted October 12, 2012 (edited) I cannot understand what kind of lack of perspective and mental balance and oversupply of free time would lead someone to manufacture untrue stories or fake artifacts of bigfoot. Holy crow, don't they have something else to do with their time?? I mean. For reals. At the end of your life, you don't want to have to say "I spent 3015.56 hours making fake bigfoot tracks and lying about matters related to hairy forest people." Do ya? No, ya sure don't. Edited October 12, 2012 by AaronD to remove religious content
Recommended Posts