Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I think Noel will be regretting those words by the end of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Nevermind Larry, I see, it's here, preface of his book. Me too, squatting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) ^ It is all very difficult to believe, but why would Minnow include a hoaxing bit in this film, the one other person I know of in the documentary is not a hoaxer, but is respected. It does not really fit with the movie to include hoaxing. perhaps they are filming different aspects of the bigfoot world which includes hoaxing. Besides Biscardi, Dyer pulled off one of the biggest hoaxes in bigfoot history. Who better to show this darker part of the bigfoot community. Edited January 30, 2013 by squatting squatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I'm sure the company had to have permits to film. I wounder if theres a way to get hold of someone in San Antonio to see the filming dates and locations of the filming. Permits are NOT required to film in the city, but ARE required for filming in our beautiful parks, including Alamo Plaza, La Villita, and the famous River Walk. Use the permit form application to begin the simple process. Thats from the San antonio film comision web site ....i'm sure it's in the public record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) Larry, source? Chris did post here he'd found RDs story to be true, but then nothing. Wish we had more clarification to why he believes this. Chris Noel has posted here..He has a BOOK out now. He already posted he believed Dyer Story. I think Noel is a BF promoter...I have seen some of his vids. He claims to be feeding them (Habituator if you will). Edited January 30, 2013 by kbhunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I e-mail thenm for information on minow films permits and location dates and times for S&%t's and giggles. See what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LarryP Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I think Noel will be regretting those words by the end of the year. The preface to his new book clearly reads like he has seen the footage. So I find it hard to believe that he would include it in the book if he wasn't convinced. Chris Noel has posted here..He has a BOOK out now. He already posted he believed Dyer Story. I think Noel is a BF promoter...I have seen some of his vids. He claims to be feeding them (Habituator if you will). You haven't even read the book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 perhaps they are filming different aspects of the bigfoot world which includes hoaxing. Besides Biscardi, Dyer pulled off one of the biggest hoaxes in bigfoot history. Who better to show this darker part of the bigfoot community. Yes, but to the best of my knowledge it is not like Minnow is out in the Bigfoot community filming the aftermath of the Tent video, they must been finished for a while now, if they are submitting to festivals. So what they film Dyer hoaxing with a fake BF and end the film...sounds pretty anti-climactic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) The preface to his new book clearly reads like he has seen the footage. So I find it hard to believe that he would include it in the book if he wasn't convinced. You haven't even read the book. Tell me how reading his book would change my opinion of him? He seems to be *very close* to BFs right (has fed them)? He recently wrote a book. Then comes out in support of Dyer's claim. I don't *need* to read his book to arrive at these conclusions. Edited January 30, 2013 by ronn1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Not sure if this has been posted.Seems to clear up the legality of shooting a BF... http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Hunting-Bigfoot/2CLdd8DIPkuNDB9B0Z52SA.cspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LarryP Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) Tell me how reading his book would change my opinion of him? He seems to be *very close* to BFs right (has fed them)? He recently wrote a book. Then comes out in support of Dyer's claim. I don't *need* to read his book to arrive at these conclusions. It's 491 pages long. So it would probably be a good idea if you read it before you form an opinion of him. Edited January 30, 2013 by LarryP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 It's 491 pages long. So it would probably be a good idea if you read it before you form an opinion of him. Tell me now...how will it change my opinion. I'm not saying he's not a great guy..or isn't earnest in his endeavor. He BELIEVES and has what he considers *evidence*. None of that will match what Dyer claims. So now he's hitched a ride on Dyer's *story*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LarryP Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Not sure if this has been posted.Seems to clear up the legality of shooting a BF... http://www.woai.com/...DB9B0Z52SA.cspx http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Hunting-Bigfoot/2CLdd8DIPkuNDB9B0Z52SA.cspx In the comments section: Unfortunately, you have been a victim of a gross misrepresentation of statements taken totally out of context and misquoted by John Lloyd Scharf. Scharf is a retired prison guard and self-proclaimed expert, who is often shunned by most Bigfoot researchers. Here is the official position of the Texas Parks and Wildlife as it should have been quoted by Scharf: "until a verifiable specimen of Sasquatch in found in Texas, our agency has no authority. Our authority is not limited because of a lapse in Texas Parks and Wildlife Code or other state laws – it is limited because there is no verifiable evidence that such a species is indigenous to Texas. Our agency only has authority over wildlife that is ‘indigenous to Texas’ (TPWD Code 67.001). Circumstantial evidence is not sufficient. If at some time, a new species is identified in Texas by some “by solid or irrefutable evidenceâ€, we do have the authority to act and protect the species as necessary. Thank you for your letter and your interest in Texas wildlife. John Herron Branch Chief, Wildlife Diversity Texas Parks and Wildlife Tell me now...how will it change my opinion. I'm not saying he's not a great guy..or isn't earnest in his endeavor. He BELIEVES and has what he considers *evidence*. None of that will match what Dyer claims. So now he's hitched a ride on Dyer's *story*. For the record, I have never met or talked to Chris Noel. What I am saying is that what he wrote about the shooting in the Preface to his book clearly indicates that he has seen the footage. So perhaps Dyer and Minnow allowed him to see the footage in return for the upfront mention in his new book that they knew would be published and released months ahead of the release of the documentary on BBC. From the Book Description on Amazon: Sasquatch Rising 2013: Dead Giants Tell No Tales: How DNA Breakthroughs and Backyard Visits Reveal the Greatest Story of Our Time http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1466360569/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_d0_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0E84HEVDD1CWFVJRXXS5&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1389517282&pf_rd_i=507846 "On September 6, 2012, the cold-blooded “harvesting†of a male specimen suddenly plunged eons of a rich relationship into raw pornography; it was a low point in the history of human ego. And yet, we must take this dark occasion to turn the page and resume the authentic story, finally forging a deeper understanding." As you can see that is right at the top of the description. So I would say there's a good chance that Dyer and Minnow were the ones hitching a promotional ride. It's also obvious how he feels about what Dyer did, if in fact he did kill a male Sasquatch in Texas last September. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Yes, but to the best of my knowledge it is not like Minnow is out in the Bigfoot community filming the aftermath of the Tent video, they must been finished for a while now, if they are submitting to festivals. So what they film Dyer hoaxing with a fake BF and end the film...sounds pretty anti-climactic. who said they quit filming right after the tent video or editing. It wouldn't surprise me if some of this uproar is included in the film. This happened way back in September and then right after that you had FB/FB claiming it was real and the best since the p/g footage and naming it one of the top ten bigfoot evidence films of all times and Noel promoting it. Those are the things the general public will hear about, not the doubters on this and other forums. I do admit I'm speculating, but this is how it always as gone down in the end, perhaps this time will be different, but I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 RD could end up on the cutting room floor for all we know. We could speculate Noel jumped the gun on the DNA breakthroughs as well as nothing has published as of yet. I must say that the photo/artist rendering on the cover of his book does resemble the tent video, mustache and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts