Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) I love this... Minnow wasn't even there? I think it all kind of came from Robert Lindsay, but the film changing names? Is that real? I can't believe it's a coincidence... is the poster real? I looked in Paulides "Tribal Bigfoot" (don't have hoopa) and the sketches "with hair removed" are all way hairier than our friend The film name is real...however RD stated on his show last night or night before, cant remember, that he knew they were going to change it to that title. Which is why he created the site that the first tent video was released on. Putting the pieces together? So is there now supposedly no documentary?? I'm inclined to not believe but if Musky is involved what is in it for him? What a grand mess... No there was a documentary filmed. Ribs nailed to a tree huh? You don't think a BF would be strong enough to rip those ribs off and get the heck out of dodge. Noooooo he decided to stand by the tree and eat them, knowing humans were all around with cameras. UH HUH? If there was INFACT ( there wasn't ) a bigfoot killed...it wasn't killed because of age, it was killed because it was mentally handicapped. I don't know what is involved for Musky, maybe he is getting paid on the side. Who knows? RD said during the 2008 hoax, he made 13,000 in one month just off his website hits alone. ( ads and banners put on site ) How much cash do you think he has been racking up on this one? oh boy! Edited February 12, 2013 by simplyskyla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djj Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) Regarding baldness of the Dyer bigfoot, if it is real.... It was a really hot and humid day and he was out in the heat of the day looking for food. Could he have been sick? Heat stroked? De mortuis nihil nisi bonum (don't speak poorly of the dead) be respected, but this strikes me as a dumb bigfoot or an ill bigfoot. If it is real. If it is real... Edited February 12, 2013 by Djj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 bipedalist, good work... looks really close. The shape looks perfect A little work with scissors and shoe polish... I've read an awful lot of reports and maybe someone else can help, but I don't recall any report ever of any degree of baldness. Bare skin on the face, yes, but never a bald forehead. This thing has a shiny bald forehead. Does anyone recall any reports of a bald forehead before? Here's a pretty recent one: http://www.bfro.net/...rt.asp?id=36671. "She described the face as that of a "person" but "twice as big" with a long, reddish-brown receding hairline and light brown, human-like facial skin". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) How many lies can Musky get caught in without people saying...HEY now wait a minute, something is fishy about him. Regarding baldness of the Dyer bigfoot, if it is real.... It was a really hot and humid day and he was out in the heat of the day looking for food. Could he have been sick? Heat stroked? De mortuis nihil nisi bonum be respected, but this strikes me as a dumb bigfoot or an ill bigfoot. If it is real. Rick said this took place EARLY EARLY morning....it wasn't that hot yet. I was just reading on squatchdetective's site that Men of Monsters ( shooting bigfoot ) was through filming before Sept 6, 2012 and by that time, the director was busy working on other projects. They received a 10k grant for the film by the TFI. submissions for the Tribeca Film Festival 2013, ended November 30th, 2012. Also it seems rick was very busy buying film equipment. ( all this is on squatchdetective's site...i take no credit for finding this ) Edited February 12, 2013 by simplyskyla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djj Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) Ok, I stand corrected, thank you! . About the camera equipment, RD states that he sold his film company in November. I wonder if that if the enters into the hoax/real/spoofing that's going on. Edited February 12, 2013 by Djj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Note RD's response to the Skulls blog, also note as I mentioned yesterday, in the Tribecca blurb it says, "non-fiction", Rick reiterates thate here: http://bigfootevidence101.blogspot.com/2013/02/people-please-remember-this-bs-post.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hawk-o Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 On FB/FB Musky is trying to discredit this article by saying it is actually talking about Biscardi's 2011 Film "Bigfoot Lives 2"...that film was release in june 2011, and according to the article, Minnow films was still filming in oct 2011. SO how could it be the same film. Musky caught in another fabrication....or am I mistaken about the release date of Bigfoot Lives 2? http://squatchdetect...nsas-not-texas/ musky: Patrick, you do realize that reference was about something entirely different in the documentary that has nothing to do with Rick Dyer. Look at the publishing date, 2011?....Rick shot his Bigfoot in 2012. musky:Lastly, if the above paper was shown in whole (not just the piece kulls is showing in yellow highliter) you'd realize this explanation page was about Tom Biscardi and his 'Bigfoot lives' part 1 & 2 DVD! Nothing to do with Rick Dyer! lol, pause at 1:01, isn't that the suit from the 2008 hoax? LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 um...unless my contac lenses are smudged, aren't the dates of his ebay purchases after the Tent video??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest njjohn Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 The fact that dyer is hoaxing is non-fiction. Where does fiction come into it? Fiction would be if Rick Dyer were a fake character. Regardless, this thread is about the suit and suit alone. The mods said not to make any other thread about the hoax/non-hoax discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Bigfoot Lives was Released in 2007.. Click this link for the IMDB page ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1394174/ ). So that is not what the article Steve posted is about. In the Musky quote - again he is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Ok, I stand corrected, thank you! . About the camera equipment, RD states that he sold his film company in November. I wonder if that if the enters into the hoax/real/spoofing that's going on. shortly after the Tent video, and previous to the body announcement did Rick Dyer buy all that video equipment Bigfoot Lives was Released in 2007.. Click this link for the IMDB page ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1394174/ ). So that is not what the article Steve posted is about. In the Musky quote - again he is wrong. He says Bigfoot lives one and two dvd release.....bigfoot lives two was released on the big screen in june 2011. How can people still take him seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Can someone help with this? I seem to recall that either Dyer or Musky mentioned that Musky was taking notes and looking over his notes on the ride back after seeing the body. How did he do that while blindfolded? Was he blindfolded on the way there, but not on the way back? Also, Musky mentioned they went into a coffee shop a couple of miles from the facility. If I did not want somebody to know where I had taken them I would not take them in a coffee shop where there is most likely a clue as to where we are. I remember Dyer talking about how on the ride back Musky was going on and on about the ear holes being so large and that may have been when he said Musky was taking notes. Does anyone remember that because it is possible I'm remembering it incorrectly, but I don't think I am? I would love for somebody to ask Dyer or Musky about the coffee shop and ride back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) Here is the breakdown....There IS a film about bigfoot hunters and apparently other monster hunters. There is a guy interviewed who apparently shot and killed a bigfoot. Biscardi is for sure in the film. RICK DYER has not been publicly associated with this film in anyway so far but by his own words. Only people with fake names and questionable backgrounds have come forward and said the body was real. ( two guys ) Edited February 12, 2013 by simplyskyla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisco Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Good find Bipedalist; it's very close to the creature in the tent video. However, it's not exactly the same. The face in the tent video has a much different nose and the eye cavities have a different shape as well. Before the whole shooting story came out, I was pretty impressed with the tend video because I could not find a match for a commercially available mask or costume. In fact, I looked recently and still can't find one. Some come close but not close enough. I also don't think it's very easy to alter a rubber mask because the material is too thin and can't be easily molded. The RD story has very little credibility. What it has going for it is the tent video and Minnow films. The rest is pure conjecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Can someone help with this? I seem to recall that either Dyer or Musky mentioned that Musky was taking notes and looking over his notes on the ride back after seeing the body. How did he do that while blindfolded? Was he blindfolded on the way there, but not on the way back? Also, Musky mentioned they went into a coffee shop a couple of miles from the facility. If I did not want somebody to know where I had taken them I would not take them in a coffee shop where there is most likely a clue as to where we are. I remember Dyer talking about how on the ride back Musky was going on and on about the ear holes being so large and that may have been when he said Musky was taking notes. Does anyone remember that because it is possible I'm remembering it incorrectly, but I don't think I am? I would love for somebody to ask Dyer or Musky about the coffee shop and ride back. Excellent point! I can't believe that didn't dawn on me. How do you create a successful hoax? Take small pieces of the truth and blend it in with huge lies. The small little truths help glue everything together, but only for a short while. Eventually the entire thing will not be able to stand on it's own and will come crumbling down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts