Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 You guys have? Would you mind reposting a short version of the evidence because I've compleatly missed it and it would take forever to re read all these post. Yep! Just read through the threads. Cant answer every question like 'is there really a body in Vegas' but quite a few important issues surrounding the story. Go see.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 @ cervelo are you suggesting that I unable to comprehend what you might write? By the way...didnt realise that you spoke for the rest of the world. Do you get paid for that responsibility and how come that doesnt seem to include me? I do live in this world? LOL....we were just thinking the same thing about you, You seem to be the major RD spokes person on this thread (no offence V) you wouldn't be on RD's payroll would you. I remember you saying on the old thread you were done with this thread. Or are did you just miss the drilling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2323 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Yep! Just read through the threads. Cant answer every question like 'is there really a body in Vegas' but quite a few important issues surrounding the story. Go see.......... GM J The question was for factual proof not theories conjectures and maybes. No offense but that is all the RD backers have provided. Oh I almost forgot sources that can't be named Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) Yep! Just read through the threads. Cant answer every question like 'is there really a body in Vegas' but quite a few important issues surrounding the story. Go see.......... should be pretty simple to summarize your evidence Jacki.....unless thats a problem. Edited February 23, 2013 by frosty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2323 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 LOL....we were just thinking the same thing about you, You seem to be the major RD spokes person on this thread (no offence V) you wouldn't be on RD's payroll would you. I remember you saying on the old thread you were done with this thread. Or are did you just miss the drilling? Um no that would be Ronn1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cervelo Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 @ cervelo are you suggesting that I unable to comprehend what you might write? By the way...didnt realise that you spoke for the rest of the world. Do you get paid for that responsibility and how come that doesnt seem to include me? I do live in this world? Wow your answer lies within your own post apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Thats not the same argument Skyla? I am talking about how whoever made the 'prop' or 'costume' would have to be made to keep quiet? Maybe they want to stay quiet for their own benefit. If I was a prop maker, and I had the chance to make a prop that was designed to fool the community, or the world, until the big reveal - I would keep it a secret so that it did fool everyone as intended so that at the end of the day I could use it on my resume and hopefully get a lot of free advertising as being the person who created the prop that fooled the world. If the Minnow film is trying to show how many people fall for a serial hoaxer once again, then this scenario is very plausible in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 GM J The question was for factual proof not theories conjectures and maybes. No offense but that is all the RD backers have provided. Oh I almost forgot sources that can't be named Good Afternoon Adam! Ok ask? What bit of the story do you want to know that we have got evidence on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) Maybe we are at a draw in this respect. On our side we have a video and eye-witness testimony, plus circumstantial evidence of the homeless dude who heard a shot, the fact that Minnow was filming Dyer, that they changed the title to "Shooting" Bigfoot, ...etc., heresay from third parties told to Chris Noel, etc. On the other side there is: a past hoaxer who has inconsistant stories as a witness, a skeptic who has made statements that some view as false or lies, (to my knowlege we have not proven there are lies), heresay involving prop busts and again hearsay from 3rd parties such as told to Mark Glascow... Sorry this is not a concise or well put together list, my point is that I think that the majority could be on the fence about this, no problem if they really weigh the arguments. I do not think any of you are foolish for doubting Rick' s story , but the ones who are even open-minded, not just the true supporters, about it have been told they are naive, gulllible, etc, etc. This is not directed at Adam or anyone really, just in general. Edited February 23, 2013 by VioletX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cervelo Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Ahhh no V the majority is silent and walked away from this nonsense the moment RDs name was brought up. If RD comes up with the body awesome, but its highly unlikley....did I just speak for the world again..... I think I did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) Maybe we are at a draw in this respect. On our side we have a video and eye-witness testimony, plus circumstantial evidence of the homeless dude who heard a shot, the fact that Minnow was filming Dyer, that they changed the title to "Shooting" Bigfoot, ...etc., heresay from third parties told to Chris Noel, etc. 1: the video is suspect. Just because FB/FB did a analysis of the video does not make it genuine many of their videos they claim to be real are questionable at best. 2: What eye-witness's, RD? unnamed cammera crews, Muskey, your just taking their word for what they say, which isn't proof 3:circumstantial evidence, none of it would hold up in a court room, a gun shot in a known drug infested homeless camp is not evidence. 4: Minnow filming, again your only taking RD's word that they filmed anything minnow (at last i heard) has not commented on anything. 5: Minnow changing the name of the film is not proof of anything. 6: hearsy told to ,person A person B person C is still just hearsay not proof. So agian, just a short list of evidence would be nice, care to try again. Yep! Just read through the threads. Cant answer every question like 'is there really a body in Vegas' but quite a few important issues surrounding the story. Go see.......... Not asking you to answer anything.....just asking for a short list of the evidence you say has been posted here. Edited February 23, 2013 by frosty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 No C, the majority is silent and at times parked lurking in this thread,lol. Maybe the majority thinks it is a hoax, but what I meant was that if one pays attention to the interesting parts of this story there is no reason to be ashamed of sitting on the fence. Frosty, I never said "proof". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cervelo Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 It's intresting for sure but it has nothing to do with Bigfoot or if RD has a body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 No C, the majority is silent and at times parked lurking in this thread,lol. Maybe the majority thinks it is a hoax, but what I meant was that if one pays attention to the interesting parts of this story there is no reason to be ashamed of sitting on the fence. Frosty, I never said "proof". correct you didn't, i apologize. I should of read the post a little closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 C- I am glad we agree it is interesting ; D correct you didn't, i apologize. I should of read the post a little closer. no problem Frosty, I don't expect any of you guys to jump the fence without proof. Although some of you may land there if there is a yey from Derek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts