32 Reports Of Bigfoot Being Shot Dead.

[hiflier]

Hello MIB,

Yeah, my friend, you have a point. Still in all, it's going to be a large, long mound and probably not that deep. Nature will take care of the details. My only conundrum is what does one do with all the left-over dirt? Hmmm. Kinda makes the rock quarries and talus fields look better'n better all the time.

That brings up a bit of a side note: It would seem that the hunters who said they buried the body weren't manaced by the Bigfoot Army as a result of the killing of a BF member? I mean how long would it take to inter a 600 lb animal? Long enough to have others find out? Just as a thought.

Edited May 8, 2014 by hiflier

[VAfooter]

Two slightly different versions of a story.

 

 

John Green -

 

A prospector Rich Grumley has known for some time says that when a boy in Georgia he saw the corpse of a huge creature that had been shot. It was in the back of a pickup, head propped against the cab, feet dragging on the ground past the tailgate, which was down. Had been killed by many shotgun slugs. Men had hunted it down because it was killing livestock. (991727)

 

 

Bigfoot On The East Coast -

 

1943 Somewhere in Georgia. A man named Crumley, an old prospector tells of a creature that killed livestock, dogs, etc. The towns people tracked the creature to Little Mountain and killed it. They then paraded it around the town on the back of a pick-up truck. The creature was 7 to 8 feet tall, with reddish brown hair 5 to 6 inches long, sparse on the face, chest, palms and the soles of the feet were bare. It had a very strong smell. The creature was buried under a pile of rocks. It should still be there. No other information available. (Little Mountain is near Dawsonville)

 

 

 

So if you are ever in GA and you see a pile of rocks....

[georgerm]

Two slightly different versions of a story.

 

 

John Green -

 

A prospector Rich Grumley has known for some time says that when a boy in Georgia he saw the corpse of a huge creature that had been shot. It was in the back of a pickup, head propped against the cab, feet dragging on the ground past the tailgate, which was down. Had been killed by many shotgun slugs. Men had hunted it down because it was killing livestock. (991727)

 

 

Bigfoot On The East Coast -

 

1943 Somewhere in Georgia. A man named Crumley, an old prospector tells of a creature that killed livestock, dogs, etc. The towns people tracked the creature to Little Mountain and killed it. They then paraded it around the town on the back of a pick-up truck. The creature was 7 to 8 feet tall, with reddish brown hair 5 to 6 inches long, sparse on the face, chest, palms and the soles of the feet were bare. It had a very strong smell. The creature was buried under a pile of rocks. It should still be there. No other information available. (Little Mountain is near Dawsonville)

 

 

 

So if you are ever in GA and you see a pile of rocks....

 

 

It's amazing that none of these dead bigfoots ever got to the right person. How is a person supposed to know who to take a BF to so it becomes a known species? Now days, someone will get one and the 'authorities' will cart if off and again its validation as a species will be cancelled. Who do you take a dead one to? 

 

Do you believe these reports?

 

Are there any more reports to add?

[Doc Holliday]

The majority are probably BS.

 

^^ this, agreed. makes for a "cool story bro" moment and that's about all.

 

C'mon, you'd settle for an indecent piece.

 

a lot of fellas probab....... nah, never mind lol

[georgerm]

Two slightly different versions of a story.

 

 

John Green -

 

A prospector Rich Grumley has known for some time says that when a boy in Georgia he saw the corpse of a huge creature that had been shot. It was in the back of a pickup, head propped against the cab, feet dragging on the ground past the tailgate, which was down. Had been killed by many shotgun slugs. Men had hunted it down because it was killing livestock. (991727)

 

 

Bigfoot On The East Coast -

 

1943 Somewhere in Georgia. A man named Crumley, an old prospector tells of a creature that killed livestock, dogs, etc. The towns people tracked the creature to Little Mountain and killed it. They then paraded it around the town on the back of a pick-up truck. The creature was 7 to 8 feet tall, with reddish brown hair 5 to 6 inches long, sparse on the face, chest, palms and the soles of the feet were bare. It had a very strong smell. The creature was buried under a pile of rocks. It should still be there. No other information available. (Little Mountain is near Dawsonville)

 

 

 

So if you are ever in GA and you see a pile of rocks....

 

The odds are that some of the reports are true. If so, it shows how difficult it is for science to get off their butts to research reports, get grants, and to find the evidence.

 

When bigfoot nasayers and ridiculers ask you, why hasn't one been brought in, stuff a copy of this page in their mouths.

Quote: Lo and behold, Robert Lindsay with his same-named blog answers that very question. His finding? There have been at least 30 incidents totaling up top 32 shootings/killings in the last 125 years.

For you long-time fans, you know we don't condone the shooting or killing of Bigfoot. We have covered those that claim they have proof of Bigfoot shootings. We have calso overed interviews of those that would kill Bigfoot. As for us? Although unlikely, we would prefer Bigfoot to let us swab his inner cheek with a Q-Tip and pluck a few rooted hairs--oh and a video would be nice.

Below we have the condensed list of all 30 incidents followed by Robert's conclusion. The list will give you a taste of what Robert has in store, as he has extended versions of all 30 incidents at his blog.

 

1. Unknown date: Klakas Inlet, Southern Alaska. In far southern Alaska on Prince of Wales Island, a Bigfoot was reportedly shot and buried at the mouth of a stream

2. Date unknown, modern era: Location unknown. A wealthy hunter reportedly shot and killed a Bigfoot, then paid a taxidermist to stuff it

3. Unknown date, modern era: Yankton, Oregon. Near the Colombia River north of Portland, a hunter shot a Bigfoot four times between the eyes and killed it.

4. Unknown date, modern era, Amboy, Washington. Near Mt. St. Helens, a hunter reported that he shot and killed a male Bigfoot on an old logging road.

5. Unknown date: Sonora, Mexico. Rich Grumley reportedthat a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then buried it.

6. 1856: Ohio or West Virginia. Possible Bigfoot skeletonfound with bullet holes in its skull.

7. July 4, 1884: East of Yale, British Colombia. “Jacko†captured by railroad men

[Rockape]

 

A prospector Rich Grumley has known for some time says that when a boy in Georgia he saw the corpse of a huge creature that had been shot. It was in the back of a pickup, head propped against the cab, feet dragging on the ground past the tailgate, which was down. Had been killed by many shotgun slugs. Men had hunted it down because it was killing livestock. (991727)

 

 

 

 

5. Unknown date: Sonora, Mexico. Rich Grumley reported that a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then buried it.

 

 

 

Is Rich Grumley some sort of BS BF reporter or something?

[Guest keninsc]

Unfortunately, stories about the shooting of Bigfoots is all to routine now. They bury the body or just leave it lay and don't bother to think. They claim they were scared to death that old John Law was going to come swooping down on them and arrest them for murder or poaching, or littering or some silly thing. So they hide the body or just left it lay and let it rot. Claim to be scared plumb to death.......and yet here they are talking about it on the podcast shows, on the web, on sites like this.

 

I suppose they don't know there is no statute of limitations on murder, but they're good talking about it now. WTH is that all about?

[VAfooter]

I suppose they don't know there is no statute of limitations on murder....

 

 

I get what you are saying, but there has to be a body to prove the murder (at least in cases like this). Extremely unlikely that authorities will take the time to search, and even if they did, the odds of them finding something are next to non-existant at  best. So very low risk when it comes to being prosecuted of talking about it, especially when there is no known victim and the speaker is not claiming it is a homeless person, hobo, drifter, or somebody like that.

 

You are correct though in that there seems to be an increase in the number of stories of shootings and bodies lately. Interesting that most all of them took place years ago.

 

For these stories, as with all BF "evidence", I come from Missouri: Show me! Interesting stuff on paper, but in the end, nothing thats moves the needle towards discovery and confirmation.

[See-Te-Cah NC]

Without evidence, I'm afraid that the great majority of shooting stories are just fanciful tails. I suppose that some shooting accounts could be true, but are simply no better than any of the others without proof.

[Incorrigible1]

Twenty years ago, I was married to Morgan Fairchild.

[Guest]

Like Norseman I am skeptical of reports/stories that don't have physical proof.   That being said I can't imagine that over the years at least a couple monkees haven't been grassed.  The reports & stories I generally don't buy are the S3 types.  I don't see the logic in doing the shoot & shovel boogie, then forgetting or ignoring the "shut up" part of the equation.  I have been in on the unpleasant task of putting down & burying a mortally wounded/ill horse a few times (the last being about a year ago and I very nearly had to help a neighbor with this you don't have to like it, you just have to do it fact of rural living just a couple weeks ago, but the horse died before I was given the final word to come over) and I can tell you that burying a horse is serious undertaking (insert rimshot here) even with a bit of time to plan, a pre-selected location, and a neighbor with a backhoe.  By all accounts an adult booger is often as big/heavy as the average quarter horse, but it is almost universal that the burial is done where & when the critter falls and I have yet to read a report where someone showed up to dig the hole with a backhoe. I can't even imagine burying something of this size in rough country with hand tools... 

Edited June 1, 2014 by NDT

[georgerm]

Many of these reports probably came from small town newspapers, and if someone bothered to research them, we would know more. We had a forum member, Tirade I believe, who posted many old reports from the 1800's.

 

My purpose for posting these reports is not for evidence, but to show how difficult it's been to get bf proven. In addition, where there's smoke there's fire, meaning some of these reports must be true. Again some names, dates, and locations are provided so someone could look up the details. There are probably some bf bones still buried in someone's field.

 

My brother expressed his doubt about bf's existence, and said one would have been brought in by this time. Well here is his answer.

 

Hello NDT and your stories about burying horses is work and a backhoe sure helps. I would imagine when the reporter claims the bigfoot was buried, this usually means a shallow grave, or  dirt, rocks and logs buried it.

 

Here are some more of the reports:

 

 

15. 1943: Georgia, near the South Carolina border. A Bigfoot was shot and killed by a shotguns, hit with 60 bullets

16. 1953: Alder Creek Canyon, Sandy, Oregon. East of Portland, a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then buried the body. Reported by Peter Byrne.

17. 1958-1960: Overton County, Tennessee. Bigfoot stealing chickens was shot dead by the owner of the chickens.

18. 1960′s: Douglas, Oregon: In the Cascades west of the Umpqua National Forest, a farmer shot a Bigfoot and then somehow managed to take it back to his house

19. 1965: Kitimat, British Colombia. On the coast of central British Colombia, a Kitimat man shot and killed a Bigfoot near town.

20. December 1967: Teton National Forest near Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Two college students from Marshalltown, Iowa, Lyle Bingaman and Mike Burton, shot and killed a Bigfoot, thinking it was a bear.
 

[JDL]

You know, Morgan Fairchild is John Galt's niece.

[Guest SoFla]

He’ll mock the fears of mystic and he’ll scorn the bookish tales
Of the fearsome apparitions of the past, but courage fails
In the night when he awakens,
all a-shiver in his bunk,
And with ear against the logging
hears the steady, muffled thunk
Of the hairy fists of monsters,
beating there in grisly play,
--Horrid things that stroll o’ night-times,
never, never seen by day,
For he knows that though the spectres of the storied past are vain,
There is true and ghostly ravage in the forest depths of Maine.

[Guest SoFla]

There are some amazing reports in these archives. Some are of ape-like creatures, some are insane naked men and some are well...bigfoot

http://www.pabigfootsociety.com/historical-bigfoot-articles.html