Bigfoot Watching Kids – Benevolent Or Malevolent Acts?

[Doc Holliday]

well, there are a lot of IF questions to be considered ........but if spying on and predation of children by BF were proven, would be more than enough reason to take measures to eradicate the species ,or at least the population in a problem area,  imo.

 

that may be best done by the introduction of a disease / bacteria / virus of some sort that humans are immunized for via bait strategically placed or aerial dispersal , much like crop dusting, over areas where incidents of abduction or habituation are suspected.

 

if they cover large territories as some suggest perhaps that could aid in the spread of whatever is used.

 

yes, that's a hard line, but human predators of children should be executed imo, it shouldn't be much different for BF with the exception that humans would be easier to locate individuals as opposed to the whole species.

 

may not be a popular notion with some, but if paulides is right imagine if that was your kid they were searching for..... or yourself.     

 

and of course, IMO and  ymmv.

[Guest]

well, there are a lot of IF questions to be considered ........but if spying on and predation of children by BF were proven, would be more than enough reason to take measures to eradicate the species ,or at least the population in a problem area,  imo.

 

that may be best done by the introduction of a disease / bacteria / virus of some sort that humans are immunized for via bait strategically placed or aerial dispersal , much like crop dusting, over areas where incidents of abduction or habituation are suspected.

 

if they cover large territories as some suggest perhaps that could aid in the spread of whatever is used.

 

yes, that's a hard line, but human predators of children should be executed imo, it shouldn't be much different for BF with the exception that humans would be easier to locate individuals as opposed to the whole species.

 

may not be a popular notion with some, but if paulides is right imagine if that was your kid they were searching for..... or yourself.     

 

and of course, IMO and  ymmv.

 

You are not the first to cross that Rubicon as some would say that is already being done or has been in recent past.

[Doc Holliday]

I wouldn't expect to be first, surely its been long considered or so I would hope if suspected necessary.

 

but if BF abduction was / is  the case, then I would also hope those measures are already in progress if needed . if not, then maybe leave them be, but I would prefer those measures as opposed to  the cover ups suggested to exist by some.

[Guest]

Simply just for the sake of discussion, how do we (as used in a general sense not me or you personally) justify a reason of “Protection of Family†when the creatures are up on the doorsteps of some residences reporting these encounters?  I am looking down your list of possibilities and #4 listed as territory and I wonder whose territory is it? Does a man, woman or owner of his property have provenance over their domain? Should we (as used in a general sense not me or you personally) forced to tolerate the intrusion or abandoned the property?  

 

If I am reading the reports correctly most of the residential out distance all others in location when measured separately in the 3,000 or so that I personally read. I found that many people are minding their business on their own property or in their homes when their encounter occurs so, the difficulty I have is deciding whose territory or families are being protected by marauding bigfoots. These folks are scared half out of their wits by large bipedal animals with unpredictable temperament or children terrorized into nightmares by the sight.  

Well, your going to have to talk to Mulder and Skully to get there.

[norseman]

Simply just for the sake of discussion, how do we (as used in a general sense not me or you personally) justify a reason of “Protection of Family†when the creatures are up on the doorsteps of some residences reporting these encounters? I am looking down your list of possibilities and #4 listed as territory and I wonder whose territory is it? Does a man, woman or owner of his property have provenance over their domain? Should we (as used in a general sense not me or you personally) forced to tolerate the intrusion or abandoned the property?

If I am reading the reports correctly most of the residential out distance all others in location when measured separately in the 3,000 or so that I personally read. I found that many people are minding their business on their own property or in their homes when their encounter occurs so, the difficulty I have is deciding whose territory or families are being protected by marauding bigfoots. These folks are scared half out of their wits by large bipedal animals with unpredictable temperament or children terrorized into nightmares by the sight.

It's legally the humans property, and we have the right to defend it. unless of course the animal is on the endangered species list.

Then it gets complicated......for some.

[Guest]

It's legally the humans property, and we have the right to defend it. unless of course the animal is on the endangered species list.

Then it gets complicated......for some.

 

Thanks Norseman, you and think alike. I am curious to see what others say in reply to that question.

[frap10]

I've read too many reports where a BF was making itself known to children and hiding when the adults were around.

Maybe curiosity but to me it wreaks of "familiarity breeds attempt".

[Guest]

Thanks Frap 10, you did a fine job articulating your point. I liked that, and I’ll have to remember that one.  

[Guest]

Well, these are the reports when people or kids see the BF, we don't hear of the thousands when no-one sees the BF.

 

Cars, and dogs and humans kill etc more children than BF proportionally. BF is a statistical phenomena, just like cars.

 

I don't like it, but I don't like kids getting run over by illegal aliens either, and we aren't doing anything about that, except making it worse.

[Doc Holliday]

I suggest similar measures for any illegal alien, dog or driving  kid killers as I did earlier for the supposed  BF body snatchers.

 

what a society allows to happen to its children speaks volumes about the character and priorities of that society.

[dlaw]

Doc and Gum.  I have talked to people in the area of Land Between the Lakes, and some of them believe that a program to eradicate one or more "bad" BF's occurred in years past-probably in the 1980's.  I have seen what appear to be concrete bunkers there supposedly used by the eradicators(believed to be military), but have no proof that they were in fact used for that.  I'm sure most of you are familiar with the "Beast of LBL", and the family that was supposedly slaughtered at LBL in the early 80's. 

[Guest]

Doc and Gum.  I have talked to people in the area of Land Between the Lakes, and some of them believe that a program to eradicate one or more "bad" BF's occurred in years past-probably in the 1980's.  I have seen what appear to be concrete bunkers there supposedly used by the eradicators(believed to be military), but have no proof that they were in fact used for that.  I'm sure most of you are familiar with the "Beast of LBL", and the family that was supposedly slaughtered at LBL in the early 80's. 

 

I heard more than one individual claim the so called, DM, exists in areas or regions east of the Mississippi,  although I found some as far west as Texas, I still do know what to make it.  I never believed in the idea of such a thing until I started to find old articles of a bipedal animal with an elongated face described in various colorful descriptions such as a “dog, baboon, a kangaroo†and so forth. I am pretty certain they are describing the same animal. 

 

The more I looked, the more I found. The area that many of these accounts originate from is a place at or very near to Land of Lakes, Kentucky and by my geography is well…. east of the Mississippi.  Are we speaking of the same area?  If we are, I always that area generated a lot of particularly vicious reports and thought it was it pretty odd.

Edited December 23, 2014 by Gumshoeye

[Guest]

2005 April

Missouri

A lady walking up to a park with her girlfriend and their kids came to a clearing with playground found a four (4TTrack) toed, 14 inch foot tracks and advised the they should leave, as they made their way back to their vehicle the children were running ahead. At this moment the lady sees what she thought was old tree in the woods until it started to move toward one of the little girls …. GCBFR 

 

Note:  In this case a lady sees what she thought was an old tree "tree stump" suddenly moving toward a little girl running way out in front of the adults. Was the creature watching the kids?   

[Guest]

Never heard of the Land O Lakes monster, lots of info out there though:

 

http://demonhunterscompendium.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-beast-of-land-between-lakes-guest.html

 

 

Sas Chronicles had that episode where the guy went after the BAD BFs, a whole family, the witness said he had really good BW pictures of them. They had to shoot them all, because they 'got out of hand''.

 

We've had some out here that ended up in 411, one was all over the news a looong time ago.

Edited December 23, 2014 by Wag

[Guest]

I am sort of torn on this one, on one hand we have the Missing 411 stories where kids disappear, but then there are plenty of stories where a BF just observes or paces kids, there was a story where a BF chased a kid who was running for his house the the BF, ran up and knocked him down and kept going, so it could be some sort of dominance display where the BF has to show-off his superior abilities.

 

 

Here is a thought, as BF are unclothed, if a naked man stood around watching kids, he would get hauled away.

Edited December 25, 2014 by Mythos