roguefooter Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 But, there have been no reported sightings of unicorns. It just means they're more cunning and stealthy than Bigfoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 67Mopar Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 But, there have been no reported sightings of unicorns. It just means they're more cunning and stealthy than Bigfoot. LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 They sometimes move in closer to human habitation during hunting season. My friends in Missouri tell me that they expect them to take up residence in the neighboring woods each year because the woods are posted against hunting. As they cycle into this area throughout the year, the deer, squirrels, and chipmunks relocate or lay low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodhi Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 (edited) Why do people refer to them as "Bigfoot"? The size of their feet are in perfect proportion with the rest of the body. Why not, "Smallhead" or "No-Neck"? Edited October 5, 2015 by Bodhi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 67Mopar Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 (edited) Even when I consider my possible encounter, the PG film, ThinkerThunker's excellent video forensics, stories from relatives, and all of the great research that's been done... I'm going to have to call BS on BF! I'm sorry, but one piece of footage from 1967 just isn't proof. Without a live specimen for study, the animal does not exist. Hats-off to anyone who can make a buck off spinning tall-tales of giant apes! I suggest doing something more productive, but hey, that's just me. Edited October 6, 2015 by 67Mopar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dmaker Posted October 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2015 ThinkerThunker and excellent video forensics do not belong in the same sentence. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 6, 2015 Admin Share Posted October 6, 2015 Even when I consider my possible encounter, the PG film, ThinkerThunker's excellent video forensics, stories from relatives, and all of the great research that's been done... I'm going to have to call BS on BF! I'm sorry, but one piece of footage from 1967 just isn't proof. Without a live specimen for study, the animal does not exist. Hats-off to anyone who can make a buck off spinning tall-tales of giant apes! I suggest doing something more productive, but hey, that's just me. Your just now coming to this conclusion? And yes, there are people out there doing something more productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 (edited) “It’s not that scientists are out there looking for it and can’t find it, scientists are looking the other way.†– Dr. John Bindernagel, Ph.D, Wildlife Biologist. Mope? Gonna have to start paying more attention, way it is. Edited October 6, 2015 by DWA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 67Mopar Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 Even when I consider my possible encounter, the PG film, ThinkerThunker's excellent video forensics, stories from relatives, and all of the great research that's been done... I'm going to have to call BS on BF! I'm sorry, but one piece of footage from 1967 just isn't proof. Without a live specimen for study, the animal does not exist. Hats-off to anyone who can make a buck off spinning tall-tales of giant apes! I suggest doing something more productive, but hey, that's just me. Your just now coming to this conclusion? And yes, there are people out there doing something more productive. Sarcasm much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 6, 2015 Admin Share Posted October 6, 2015 i was thinking the same thing..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 67Mopar Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 (edited) i was thinking the same thing..... With 6,408 BF Forums posts, who could disagree? For someone who doesn't believe the creature exists, you sure do spend a lot of time here. Edited October 6, 2015 by 67Mopar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 7, 2015 Admin Share Posted October 7, 2015 I would suggest you read some of my posts....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted October 7, 2015 Author Share Posted October 7, 2015 i was thinking the same thing.....With 6,408 BF Forums posts, who could disagree? For someone who doesn't believe the creature exists, you sure do spend a lot of time here. Surely you can't be serious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 67Mopar Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 (edited) i was thinking the same thing.....With 6,408 BF Forums posts, who could disagree? For someone who doesn't believe the creature exists, you sure do spend a lot of time here. Surely you can't be serious... Yes, I am. He agreed with my comment on my doubting their existence. Does that not indicate he feels the same way? While on the subject... If these animals exist, why has no one captured a single picture via game cam? There must be thousands of cameras of out there, yet not a single pic? How about home surveillance? Footprints up the butt, but not a single shot of Sasquatch. Oh well... Edited October 7, 2015 by 67Mopar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 7, 2015 Admin Share Posted October 7, 2015 *swoosh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts