NorCalWitness Posted December 10 Posted December 10 On 6/26/2023 at 1:48 PM, ThePhaige said: Wow MIB you really said a lot there concerning what in my opinion is so rather a rangy list of generalizations directed at Scott Carpenter and the context of his involvement etc.... You lost credibility with me there when you say he is way out on a woo limb, the fact is I would say if there is a exact opposite of this then Scott more closely falls into a mostly NON woo category.. in fact Its been years since he decidedly stopped seeking out the SSQ but he does and has helped out many people who are actually dealing with SSQ ... So in a way I kind of resent your evaluation of the individual when you obviously dont have all the context or have decidedly not revealed it here... I will go on record to say, people may not like the man personally for whatever reason, but he has indeed made a contribution and to sort of infer otherwise in my opinion while incorporating a kind of ad hominem slant there is also slightly offensive on a scientific level ... Some may call it a tactic, but knowing you for some years now I will like to think of it in another way... I will also go on record saying that while I dont think They and Scotts conclusions are exactly correct... but the DNA is... more on that later perhaps RIP Mr. Carpenter.
Recommended Posts