Forums

Really? BP did 2 million intercepts last year.    

There are a few things to my premise, but the biggest point has to be quality of videos.    If there are tons and tons of videos out there that's great.  However, what are the top 3 or top 5 most convincing out there?   I am assuming the PGF is the mount Rushmore.   It's #1.   What are the others?    1- PGF 2- ? 3- ?     What are those top 3?  Top 5?   Most of us know we want a body.  A body on a slab would convince everyone.  Since we lack such a body, the PGF is a pretty good second option.  Even then I'm guessing the PGF doesn't even convince 50% of those who view it.               We cannot know how many Bigfeet are out there.  I'm guessing there are very few on their way to extinction.  If bigfoot exists it elusiveness is probably based on population density not a government cover up.   To me that is a safer bet.           Which is more likely:      1) The tech has revealed proof Bigfoot exist and the government keeps it quiet.                     - Consider every additional thing needed to make that true. 2) This same massive excellent nowhere-to-hide tech has yet to see a single bigfoot at a level of the PGF?  A single hit/ or sighting would direct teams of wildlife people to this Bigfoot?                         -if there are enough fishing lines in the water, enough depth finders out there and you catch no fish the lake may just not have any fish.                  With that many real and electronic eyes, we don't have a Bigfoot hit.  If not, I choose the few number available over 1,000s able to keep quiet.   They couldn't keep quiet about an entire exhaustive list of confirmed government secrets, but all involved somehow can keep quiet about Bigfoot.       This more favors Bigfoot not existing at all instead of Bigfoot being an obvious known entity our government keeps quiet.     I'm fine with the truth being in the middle.  There are few bigfoot if real.  The assumed territory is expansive.   Scientist work in the government.  Those scientists generally think Bigfoot is not proven.  To the extent they may believe or disbelieve is on a continuum in flux made up with all kinds of people with different levels of complex belief.   They have bigger fish to fry and worry about Bigfoot until one drops into their lap.       Doesn't look like a very secure border to me.

Just got back from a hike. My left arch is killing me. Old is dumb.   Got up to Priest lake yesterday.

I think he is a complete hoaxer.   But ask Kitakaze if Roger Patterson is a hoaxer? The answer would be the same.   But thats not the point I am trying to make.

interestingly enough I was doing bigfoot research on google and came across this post from over 8 years ago.. on BFF.  seems other people have basically called out todd standing before