Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/20/2011 in all areas

  1. and what side is that, Hunster? Your side. The side in which honor has nothing to do with it. (Your words......need the exact quote?) Sorta' like Wallace's. You don't think the photos comparing the feet and the tracks match? Some do. Again, I have a great distrust for anything from the Wallace side of the equation (for very good reason), and that includes his/their statements or items, and I have good confidence in Green's statements. What tracks would that be? What do you mean by "pooh poohed"? These: You "pooh poohed" them by pointing out how the trackway was initially found by Freeman, who couldn't be trusted, much like I pooh pooh this 50 year old speculation because members of the Wallace family claim that Ray hoaxed them, and I don't believe that they can be trusted. Funny how that works out, huh? what pattern and what side? Inconsistent "skepticism", and from your side. Oh, ok, well sounds like you enjoy that, have a good time with that. Like I wrote, I have no problem with the continued speculation, sniping, doubt, and denial. I believe Green, and disbelieve Ray Wallace and his family. However, I may continue to point out the fallacy of such speculation as I please, and thanks, I'm having a great time with that.
    1 point
  2. I'd like to go on record as one who takes John Green at his word. I sure accept his word beyond those who have established a record of dishonesty, like Ray Wallace, Ivan Marx, Bob Heironimous, etc. Green has made obvious efforts to maintain his honesty and good standing, which is precisely what one would expect from a good journalist and newspaperman. If he was on a scene and describes what he saw, and then defends it when challenged, I feel quite confident in depositing that into my sasquatch bank account.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...