Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/01/2011 in all areas

  1. IMHO it all boils down to this. Hansen made a livelihood out of separating marks from their money. At the end of the day he depended on his gaff to put food on his family's table. The fact that he's still managing to do it from beyond the grave should come as little surprise.
    1 point
  2. No, you got an answer, you just don't want to face that your criticism applied to your "Friend". Sure. Each of these events that he supposedly had a negative reaction to he used for advertising the Iceman. Sanderson prints the article and is on TV, and Hansen makes a sign saying scientists say the Iceman is real. FBI want to investigate, he makes a sign saying it's wanted off of the FBI. Hansen revelled in any attention that the Iceman got and used it to his advantage. The Georgia Boys allowed their Iceman to be examined and tested for DNA identification, while Hansen refused for his Iceman to be physically examined in any way and made up story after story to cover his admission of it being fake, because he knew that if people want to believe, they will accept anything you tell them no matter how many times you lie. If the Georgia Boys didn't submit to a test, you guys would still be here arguing endlessly that it was real. Which is why he exploited and advertised every allegedly negative experience he had, great way to stay off of the spot. According to who? lol here's another for you, argumentum ad hominid glacialis amÄre.... Especially if it has anything to do with lending doubt about sasquatch! We must fiercely defend every bit of evidence, no matter how obviously fake it is!
    1 point
  3. "Winning". Are you a Charlie fan? Are you in to this to learn, or to "win"?
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...