Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/30/2011 in all areas

  1. That wouldn't be that hard to explain. It probably sounds like I am reaching for explanations. It would really muddy up the water though as far as the DNA analysis goes. Just to clarify, I haven't formed any opinions on any results and I am just speaking hypothetically. It would be very surprising to me to learn that they are closer than a Neanderthal if that is what the evidence actually shows. Even if that were true, I would still suspect that more ancient DNA might be there or essentially they didn't lose some of their "wild" characteristics even after hybridizing with our ancestors over the past few million years. I could actually see that happening if a creature was evolved to live on the periphery of a more dominant species. That could be something that would be very difficult to see in even a whole genome. The bigfoot isn't necessarily going to be close to a human because it contains human mitochondrial DNA. That would imply though that they are close enough to breed successfully with a modern human at least occasionally. If it happened many generations ago as is implied by the widely spread out samples, from what I understand, it could be possible that the original modern human nuclear DNA was so diluted that it isn't even significant. There are many examples of hybrids with more than a million years separation and I believe that extends to a few million years in some cases. All you need to get the mitochondrial DNA is to have a female modern human somewhere back in the lineage. If that original hybrid were in the last 200,000 years it would most likely be in the range of modern humans as far as the mitochondrial DNA goes. Mitochondrial DNA doesn't really have any effect on how we appear. It is just involved with metabolism. The mitochondria is like a fuel cell that provides energy for cells and the DNA of the mitochondria contains a subset of some of the genes that are needed by the mitochondria to function. Some of its genes are provided by the nuclear DNA. That probably makes it less likely for a very divergent mitochondria to function well enough to be selected for. That would be the logical assumption of why it would become the dominant mitochondria of a population. The other possibility is that BF is descended from the small original hybrid population and has a very compressed genome. I am not jumping to conclusions. There could be others with more divergent mitochondria. I was just speaking hypothetically about how a population could evolve by natural selection our mitochondria without being that closely related. It is possible that our mitochondria gave them an advantage so the others with other mitochondria died out. There is apparently some fairly strong selection for specific mitochondria. That is how we as modern humans all share a common female ancestor about 200,000 years ago. If not for selection pressure, the other mitochondria that existed 200,000 years ago would still be around. The point of that rather confusing statement was our mitochondria might have been an advantage and was selected for like a good genetic characteristic would be. That is how it could become widespread in the population without them necessarily being that closely related to us.
    1 point
  2. Back to you Pattywagon, I am retired law enforcement and don't go anywhere without legal protection. It is a good habit that saved my life last year when I was attacked deep in the woods by three feral Pit Bull dogs. Without having my 45 ACP, I would have been their helpless chew toy! While standing there in the woods with the guide that night, the words "Why are you carrying a gun?" came rushing into my head. It surprised me greatly because no one knew I had one tucked away in my cargo pants pocket. I looked around and thought "Where did that come from....????" I ignored it until it came blasting back into my head again. At that point I answered it with a speaking thought "It is a tool I have carried for protection. I have carried it around my family and friends for years. I haven't hurt them with it and I won't hurt you now". With that, the first Bigfoot stepped out from behind a tree. I have read and spoken to folks about this. Some call it "Picture talking" in your head. I don't have any explanations, but I do know what I clearly heard in my head. There are some who say we as humans had this keen sense before technology invaded our life style and there are a few who still have this among us. Don't know about that, but I do know what happened to me that night....
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...