Leaderboard

I think the term "human" can be used either to refer to Modern sapiens or to refer to a number of our ancestors. So, with ancient DNA in hand, and using the broad sense of the word, there is room for bigfoot without it being exactly "US".

My point was that a scientist claiming to have analysed foot prints ( one who has specific expertise in foot anatomy ) would be on equal ground as you, whom would try and convince the scientific community with a clear photo of BF, which you have no special knowledge to authenticate. Do you see the hypocrisy? As far as unknown DNA goes, you can't just "have" it your way, it belongs to a known or it doesn't. If science says it is different from knowns then you will have to throw those scientists under the bus with the collectors. This ofcoarse goes into conspiracy in order to preserve the grounds of denial.