Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/01/2011 in all areas

  1. "SHE IS A SCIENTIST, & saying otherwise shows a serious lack of knowledge about the subject!!" Have to disagree. Saying she is not a scientist is a willful attempt at character assassination, a blatant attempt to discredit a person of scientific standing who may offer some evidence that may support the idea BF/sasquatch does exist. Typical of the "critical thinker" who knows how to be critical, but does not know how to think. Bill
    3 points
  2. So we have gone from attacking Sas, to attacking the story, to attacking the messengers...and now to character assassination. It would appear the skeptics are getting nervous.
    1 point
  3. Jeff Corwin and Bill Nye...the science guy. First choice would have been Steve Irwin, but he's dead. Would have been great to hear him say "crikey, he's grumpy", as he's being pummeled with a ten inch log.
    1 point
  4. And your above replys are equally interesting coming from someone who couldn't understand what we could compare suspect Squatch DNA to, in order to prove their existence.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...