Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/11/2011 in all areas

  1. Kristoffer Domeij, a dedicated soldier will forever be missed by myself and all of his family and friends he gave all for his country.
    1 point
  2. I think Parn is enjoying yanking everybody's chain.
    1 point
  3. You know where the publication is don't you Parn? That bit about submitting to more than one journal and all. And where is the Human DNA for that matter. Same place? There wouldn't be a paper if there was only human DNA, surely you don't believe that Ketchum could get as far as to have something in review with randomly collected human hairs found in the wild.
    1 point
  4. Your personal favorite may not be so diagnostic as a non-human trait. Quadrupedal locomotion seems to be a an exercise in fitness training these days.
    1 point
  5. Art, thank you ever so much for your critique of my post. I understand your position, and I respect it. However I am not dictating here. Someone else has already done that, by coming up with the guidlines to begin with. The same ones that we get reminded of everytime someone doesn't believe what we say. I am once again, not defending or speaking for Swamp Bandit, or anyone else. The true-false, back and forth method he has presented would understandingly T off most folks. I don't believe every word out of his mouth either. But doesn't anyone but me understand, he has deliberately ruined his credibility here? Not by accident, but by design. Don't know why, don't care. I would think people were nuts if they agreed with everything everyone else said. But, it's the method by which the disagreements happen here, (and rather often) that gripes me. Less manners, and more confrontation. Why is that? People certainly wouldn't present arguments to strangers in such a manner if they were face to face. And even though it is the internet, for what this forum is supposed to be, a quantity of decorum would seem to be applicable here.I don't care what someones view is, if it's presented to me in a mutually respectful manner, I have no problem whatsoever with it. Once again, Just my opinion.-Knuck
    1 point
  6. I got em safe on Excel G, no probs there.. Yeah don't take too much notice of that PacNW, that was just one ( of the smaller ) Wilderness areas also with only 10 Sightings, the Alpine Lakes data would be more accurate as it is bigger & has more Sighting to crunch numbers of.. I'll do the Olympics today/tonight as i believe they'll be even more helpful due to the Reports and the fact that it's the biggest Wilderness in WA.. HUGE thumbs up G..
    1 point
  7. I made some plots of the PNW area. I selected a square (50N, 129W and 40N,107W), the pic below is the approximate area. Below is the scatter plot af all sightings for the area between 1999 and 2010. And individual years. I think this confirms that sightings in the winter occur at lower elevations.
    1 point
  8. Parn has seen no evidence of any kind. (I don't know that for a fact, but I am using his "state unsubstantiated opinion as fact to appear authoritative" strategy.) Tim B
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...