Leaderboard

She has said, The samples are from multiple submitters and multiple locations. The testing was done by multiple labs. The results were not what was expected. The results identify a new primate and will vindicate the efforts of researchers in the field. The results have been put into a paper. The paper has been submitted to a stringent and thorough review. The amount of data that was submitted to support the paper was "scientific overkill". The paper should be published soon. Now the above is paraphrased from memory rather than gathering her statements, but I think I got the gist of what she has said herself publicly. That doesn't sound to me like. Just trying to keep the facts as straight as possible in the midst of a "charlie foxtrot".

Just wait for the sequences, Mulder. Then it will be necessary to prove the DNA is just 'human' even though it's never been seen before. The skeptic will have a positive statement to demonstrate, or be silent.