Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. southernyahoo

    southernyahoo

    Passionate Member

    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      5,026

  2. indiefoot

    indiefoot

    Sésquac

    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      2,106

  3. roguefooter

    roguefooter

    Passionate Member

    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      3,506

  4. SweatyYeti

    SweatyYeti

    Passionate Member

    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      9,218

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/11/2012 in all areas

  1. indiefoot
    It's amusing to me how DNA evidence is accepted with very little hesitation in any number of circumstance. People going to and getting out of prison left and right. An ancient finger bone gives us a new hominin. Enter Bigfoot and the stuff is fraught with problems. No one but Todd Disotell knows anything about it.
    2 points
  2. southernyahoo
    The DNA will be what science says it is. When there is contamination,they can tell. When it's degraded,they can tell. When there is insertions,inversions and deletions, they can tell. You could have a mess to sort out, but it wouldn't publish without something conclusive.
    2 points
  3. Incorrigible1
    I agree. Great advice.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...