Leaderboard

Like it or not, those that make it thier career here on this forum, (those that spend EVERY waking moment, and some of thier sleeping ones), telling everyone that will listen that there is no such thing as "Bigfoot" or "Sasquatch," are indeed here for the OBVIOUS purpose of creating an air of doubt in believers, and discredit knowers in general. There WILL be a "crow pickin", all you can eat. Bring your own bib, it's gonna be sloppy! No knives and forks allowed!! The serving platter is being loaded as I speak! LOL You'll see.-Knuck

Yeah...I just don't see it that way. I don't think most of the skeptics here are trying to "convince people that there is no such thing as bigfoot". I think most of the skeptics here are simply trying to convince people that there is not a lot, if any, of concrete evidence that proves that bigfoot exists.....so far. ..Just say'n. (Disclaimer: Slabdog is not a paid spokesperson or representative of Skeptics inc., nor does Slabdog receive any specially priced deals, discounted rates and or preferential treatment by or from Skeptics Inc. The views expressed are his own)

What I don't understand about this whole discussion is that too many people here seem to think the effort, the report, the publication, the pre-release press, the comments or lack of same, etc. should be by some normal rules, when the crux of this whole matter is that if the DNA validates some currently unknown biological entity, however near or far it may be from us "humans" on the family tree, this matter is so far from "normal" that any expectation of normal rules or procedures is truly naive (most diplomatic word I could think of. The other options were less kind). Normal just doesn't apply. Can those who want normal procedures please wake up and pay attention to the potential (but very abnormal) impact that Dr. Ketchum and Ms. Ramey may be dealing with? Bill