CT, allow me to assist you as a new member in recognizing the difference between besmirching and critical scrutiny.
This is critical scrutiny...
Meldrum has been wrong in his support of a number of hoaxes and misidenfications as being from Bigfoot.
Meldrum before he went to the source on Snow Walker...
Meldrum supporting an elk lay as Bigfoot body print...
Meldrum supporting a Wallace hoax...
Meldrum says that this left foot...
Made this BCM impression overlaid with the Wallace stomper that actually made it...
Meldrum supporting this Vision Realm $75,000 CGI animation...
"With this animation now, I'll be able to not only visualize, but more importantly quantify these aspects of this peculiar bent-kneed gait on a flexible flat foot. I've also noticed right away that there's a interesting rotation of the leg and foot that is not typical of a modern human gait." - Jeff Meldrum
Meldrum on floppy breasts in the Memorial Day Footage...
“Also discernible were unmistakable breasts that gyrated with each running step.†- Jeff Meldrum
Jeff Meldrum supports all of the following as being from real Bigfoot creatures...
You see, saying someone is wrong is not besmirching them. I encourage you to become familiar with the distinction. You are asking people if they are familiar with Meldrum's work and his evidence regarding Bigfoot. I am very familiar. I have discussed various pieces of evidence with Meldrum personally on multiple occasions. Meldrum has been wrong about a lot of Bigfoot evidence. he is not a Bigfoot expert. No one is. Scientists are not above making mistakes or having tunnel vision looking at evidence. Meldrum was a Bigfoot believer since childhood. It is only natural that he can make the mistakes he has. It doesn't mean he is a bad professor or shouldn't do the work he does. All it means is that habving the Meldrum stamp of approval is going to mean absolutely nothing to the informed skeptic of Bigfoot.