Leaderboard

No that's just a skeptics thought process. Bear tracks can be hoaxed too, but that wouldn't make them all suspect. The difference is still that you don't know bigfoot exists. Once proven, then we can conclude that some of the tracks are most likely real. On the subject of consecutive tracks having dermals, I've not heard of any, though I think the prospect of finding real dermals is small in the first place. It takes very fine substrate and yet tacky firm like clay to hold them while the track is cast. The right casting technique used in optimal circumstances can capture them but it is not a given. Just because someone poured plaster in an impression does not mean there would be dermals there, if it were a real bigfoot track to begin with.