Leaderboard

Dr. Ketchum is a layperson? Or would be so received? I assume you're not saying that being published in a journal is a higher priority than preventing a murder. My point is, if the TBRC refuses delivery of the irrefutable fact that BF=human, then shouldn't that fact be more widely proclaimed to force the issue? If not, then I doubt that such unimpeachable proof exists.

If bigfoot are some form of human (as some insist), and if Dr. Ketchum's research demonstrates this (as some are quite vociferous in proclaiming), and if​ those results are known to some of the sample contributors (as has been claimed), and if Dr. K is very concerned for the creature's welfare (as evidenced by her organizing a Sasquatch Protection Group), then why are those same sample contributors and Dr. Ketchum not all up in the grill of the TBRC (like, BIG TIME?!?). It seems that if all those conditional statements above are true (as some "Bigfoot are humans" proponents maintain), then withholding that info from the TBRC and others who are actively trying to harvest a specimen would make those who know BF=people complicit in murder if a specimen is successfully collected, no?

I agree.....even modern humans deprived of our normal culture during developmental years as children can have drastic effects. It's a forbidden experiment but occurs with feral children. I think there is genetic and behavioral differences between us and bigfoot, but that wouldn't necessarily make them more ape than us or less human biologically. Words are sounds. How do you know they aren't words? So bigfoot doesn't carry the right descriptor or has it been anthropomorphicized? Why invent a new name but remain the the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy? Why make things more confusing? Do you believe there are other types besides the ones with human faces?