Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/06/2012 in all areas

  1. Personally I thought it was cool to see the Hairy Man Pictographs in the show. The still look good after all these years. I know the tribe sang a traditional song and told a story, but that apparently got edited out. I wish it hadn't and I wish they had talked more about the significance of the pictographs.
    1 point
  2. From the Knapp article- I think this is telling: Tim B.
    1 point
  3. Nice rant but my point still stands.
    1 point
  4. Igor does not say the American paper was rejected, too many assumptions are being made based on this post that seems to be speaking obtusely about the past and present in one post, so that it is hard to determine what exactly he is trying to say.
    1 point
  5. Oh we can do that, but without the back biting. I understand the sense you have about double checking things, but also see that it is as much about being in the know, as it is making sure there is real science going on for you. You have two labs or three working on a double check, but on one sample. Remember that Ketchum has alot more samples, and a bigger picture to look at. It would be much easier to see the cogency of evidence that would approach the level of proof. Some of those initial red flags you may see in the evidence or interpretations may be the very things that make the samples unique and very interesting, if not inexplicable.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...