Leaderboard

as far as trying to convince people and maintaining credability i will leave that up to the people who are concerned with that sort of thing, im not our society is built in a way that keeps people confined to a box and cant think for themselves. we are at a point where we are just now being able to see that most of what we are taught especially concerning history is flat-out wrong or just lies. im glad im not one of those people. im thankful for the ability to be able to think for myself and not worry about how others feel about it or me as far as the pysic stuff thats attributed to bigfoot well guess what, thats a part of it and has been for hundreds of years. even in my thread of bigfoots mental powers. i didnt make any of that stuff up its stuff that people whom have had contact with them comes back and says

My first choice would be John Green, without whom none of us would have the understanding and foundation that we have today. If anyone deserves to see a living, breathing sasquatch, it's him.

On May 11, 2012 I started a thread entitled, Mr. D.B., Et Al, Your missing Skunk Has Been Located." That posting was for the benefit of the "Original 6" who at the time had a very active project going on at their XXXX XXXX site in the SE part of my home state. At that time I only knew the names of three of the "Original 6". That group does in fact have the money, equipment and land in prime Bigfoot areas in my state, and in at least five other states, to capture, contain and care for any of the four types of unclassified primates that inhabit this country. Since that initial post I have learned much more about the group and their operations. At the beginning I was very PO'ed when I discovered they were NOT trying to capture one of the creature, but to kill one. Yes, they did have signed DNA's for the people who they hired to do much of the field work, but in this state those agreements were worthless. What they were trying to do, and what they actually did here was illegal. I caught h--- from most of the forum members for making that post and was accused spreading BS. So, in answer to questions asked many time on this particular thread; (a) The names of most of the "Original Six" are known, they have a revised plan of capture and containment, © At least one of them is still paying "hired guns" to track and kill one in my state, although he, like at least five more such "hired guns", have beeen thoroughly convinced they should take their talents elsewhere, (d) They have spent multi-millions of dollars for land in my state alone and those purchases are public record, The man in charge of the overall operation is, from all accounts, a rational, personable and very intelligent person. The man in charge of the operation in my state is, from the accounts of all the many residents of the counties who know and have worked for him, a dyed-in-the-wool xxxxxxx. So, yes, it is possible they have done what they set out to do; capture a Bigfoot. It is a near certainty that their land purchases alone in the states in which they operate is nearing or surpassing the half-billion dollar mark. But, they are not concerned about the land costs; they have a very wise plan to recoup that expense plus a healthy profit.The handwiting is clearly written "on the wall." Waiting for a few more shoes to drop,

I would like to say something about this topic. RayG has stated his intention for starting this topic. He has also added a disclaimer stating that it isn't an official BFF stance or the opinion of the staff, which it isn't. Although he is a staff member, RayG is also a member, and as a member he has the right to post this topic. Nowhere in our rules does it state that the staff can't have an opinion or be skeptical. RayG has presented his opinion and evidence for discussion just as numerous other members - skeptical and proponent alike - have done. I have watched RayG step up to serve all of the forum members, regardless of their stance on the subject. He has been both fair and diligent in his duties. While his topic might not be popular with some, it is nonetheless an allowable topic on our forum according to the rules.