Leaderboard

Unless your signing in a "feel good" assault weapons ban.........

Bartlojays and Tyler H., I Think you guys have done a great job of being open with information and should be commended. Do you have any formal or informal investigative training?

i hate to say this but there could be a much more direct attempt at manipulation here. no dna vetting, claims of it being human and now a petition for protection.........and no type specimen. and am not sure about the leak being genuine either its almost as if they are bluffing at the poker table.

You can't protect something that isn't there. Show that it is there, then you'll get all the support in the world to protect it.

Just curious, SSQ. Did a "Ketchum DNA expert insider" tell you this also? For many years, a part of me has had a sneaking suspicion that if we really knew (and understood) all there was to know about bigfoot, instead of "protecting" them, our reaction might be more along the lines of extermination. Until we actually know what we're dealing with you can count me out.

Why not a bagel. It's got a fairly tough outer skin on which saliva is as likely to pool and dry on the outside as to soak in. Makes sense to me as something I might choose if I were looking for a food item which might both tempt a squatch to take a bite and also have a higher chance of preserving some saliva. Fact is that the criticism has less to do with the bagel than it has to do with the critics. Same goes for the proponents. There's precious little objectivity on either side at this point. For the most part people's assertions are now shaped by their attitudes.

I'll sign it the second the species is recognized by science........and not a second before.