Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/10/2013 in all areas

  1. If I'm understanding you properly, you're saying that Finding Bigfoot is where you should go to have evidence investigated properly? I'm sorry, but those clowns are the epitome of how not to investigate something like this properly. Their format: follow up on obvious hoax video. Find nothing. Have a televised town hall meeting where anyone who can make up a story can get on tv. Chart out those stories and go to the exact same spot that someone had an encounter, oh maybe a week ago, maybe four years ago, spend a night howling into the wind and waving donuts around, find nothing, but declare victory and move on. Yeah, that is not investigating it properly by any account. And if I misunderstood you and you meant the BFRO overall, then I still kind of have a problem with an organization that investigates BF sightings by using people that have an obvious bias. If MM et al on the show are any indication of the average BFRO investigation, then it seems that leading the witness and jumping to conclusions on behalf of the witness is common practice. Again, not really the best type of investigation.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...