Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/02/2013 in all areas

  1. You know what would restore my faith in the eternal curiosity of mankind? After somebody like Bipto posts, in exemplary detail, the fruits of a long hot Summer in the cause of possibly furthering the knowledge about a subject I presume ALL here are interested in? It would be along the lines of, "Hey, you've posted some information that is pretty intriguing Bipto...thanks for the effort you and your people made....you've given me something to grapple with here and I can't say I understand it completely, but I'll try." In fact, I want to say that right now. But what do we get instead? It is right up there to read. Too much.
    1 point
  2. ^^^ Except none of the evidence for Sasquatch is proven. It cannot be until Sasquatch is proven. Until that time everything with the evidence you mention remains conditional upon Sasquatch actually being proven. Until that point, all you have is a bunch of evidence that you claim comes from a Sasquatch or that you believe supports the claim of Sasquatchs' existence. But it cannot be stated as proven, as you state above , until Sasquatch is actually proven--which to date it is not,which you also point out above. So if you accept one of those facts, you have to accept the other. So please stop stating as fact that Sasquatch evidence is proven. It's not. The nuance does not escape you, yet you continually post statements as fact that are clearly not.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...