Leaderboard

I haven't done that. ( pick apart Freeman) To the contrary: 1) I find the tracks in the footage to be preposterous 2) I find the fact that such an elusive creature would put itself in a situation to be easily filmed by a guy talking aloud and walking around for a significant amount of time prior to the "money shot" to be preposterous. 3) I find his (Freeman's) mannerisms, comments and voice tone on the tape to be suspicious ( I.e. contrived) 4) I find the film subject to be bulky, move unnaturally, appearing to look down at his pathway as a man in a mask would, and more akin to a fat guy in a fur suit than an elusive primate designed by Mother Nature to be an extremely stealthy apex predator. So separate the "Freeman shots" that others are taking from the footage itself. I ask again. Why is it good?

Boots on the ground is a nice idea, but, assuming BF is real, where would you put these boots? In all my years looking into the BF thing, I can't say I did a lot of 'in the field' looking for sh, but we don't see much BF evidence coming in, regardless of the total coverage we have of the NA back country. Peace But this is Cotter's whole point. You're spending more time looking at the " BF thing " but admittedly little time actually in the woods looking for your quarry. This is the problem with the online community, too many people prefer to look at the people in the community for some strange reason than get out to look for the animal in the forest. Make no mistake though, I'm not saying you shouldn't lose interest in the subject, I couldn't give two hoots what you do, but I just can't see how people can lose interest in something when they don't actually really look into that something, but just look into the circus that surrounds that something instead. Phew, that line could possibly be another sig line like I have already..