Leaderboard

Relativity is an explanation of why the universe is as it is. You cannot see or touch relativity; it's an intellectual construct created by humans. It's not something that was there and we didn't know about but a theory of understanding of why and how things happen. Like black holes are a theory to explain why we have certain data. You can't seem to differentiate between explaining a phenomenon, and providing evidence that the phenomenon is there. The only phenomenon as far as Bigfoot is concerned, is that people report it. That's easily explainable without postulating an undiscovered ape. Provide something that is more than a report, and science will rethink its explanation. I note again that you refuse you say exactly what you think science should do, or who you think should do it.

Now that I can buy. You heard a speech pattern which had a phraseology to it. The thought of it being a sentient being or having a sentient mind would also lead you to believe they would have some form of expressions, which the speaker in the recording is trying to convey. You may be able to list numerous vocal captures in the past which contain the basic building blocks of speech, however they just aren't present in this particular recording. I believe I'm hearing a primate in this recording, doing a very poor interpretation of what they think a Sasquatch should sound like. I'm just not able to believe this is anything other than a human making what they think are Sasquatch sounds. Had he gone out of the tent and gotten and image of the producer of the sounds I may feel different, or my suspicions may have been proven right. Maybe that why he never leaves the tent. Hey, it's just my take on this recording, obviously others have a different take on it, and that's what makes it all so interesting.

If you are to look at Paul Freeman's track record (all his findings, be it footprints, hair, videotape or still photos) he is arguably the most successful field Bigfooter this world has ever seen. Yet the paradox of that statement is Paul was never a very physically fit person, so I find it difficult to believe that he was able to find more evidence for Bigfoot than anyone else. And for those of us who really looked and listened to the the videotape made by the English TV crew, Paul makes a false statement about something he should know better about, so that really opened my eyes about his credibility. If you are just a believer in all things Paul, then certainly please disregard these comments. The numerous times Paul has been the subject in the Bigfoot Times newsletter: Freeman, (Leon) Paul, Feb. 1998, p. 2; Sept. 1999, p. 4; Dec. 1999, p. 2; May 2000, p. 2; Feb. 2001, p. 4; Mar. 2001, p. 2; Apr. 2001, p. 2; Nov./Dec. 2001, p. 2; Nov. 2002, p. 4; Feb. 2003, p. 2; Apr. 2003, p. 1, (obit) p. 3-4; May 2003, p. 1-2; Jan. 2004, p. 3; Feb. 2004, p. 1; Feb. 2004, p. 4; Sept. 2005, p. 4; Dec. 2005, p. 2; Mar. 2006, p. 3; June 2006, p. 3; Oct. 2006, p. 3; Nov. 2006, p. 2; July 2007, p. 1-2; May 2008, p. 2; Feb. 2009, p. 1; Aug. 2009, p. 2-3; Sept. 2009, p. 1-2; Oct. 2009, p. 3; Oct. 2010, p. 1; Jan. 2011, p. 3; Feb. 2012, p. 3-4 When Paul died I phoned the family and his son was quick to get off the phone once I started asking questions and I found that of interest. Having met Paul once, in June 1989 in Pullman, Washington, I don't know how much of his claims are legitimate and what is B.S. Let's just put it this way. He is not the type of person you would loan $20 to and expect to get your money back. And as a note, his videotape was shot in 1992, NOT 1994 and Dr. Jeff Meldrum, who reviewed the late Vance Orchard's book on behalf of the the late Richard Greenwell's publication for the International Society of Cryptozoology, should have caught that one, as he makes the same mistake in his book, Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. Daniel Perez editor/publisher: Bigfoot Times Bigfoot At Bluff Creek Big Footnotes

Jerrywayne, thanks for your concern and I mean that. First off I want to say that if I could spend the rest of my life searching for Sasquatch.........I would have died and gone to heaven! Right now working in the oil field..........is a living to be sure, but my heart and mind live in the mountains. And certainly not out here in the flat, muddy, sticky plains. Some days I just lust to see a hunk of granite.......or a evergreen tree, simple things. Anyhow I don't care if somebody paid me to ride my horse everyday in the wilderness searching for pink unicorns..........none of it would be wasted on me. I suppose many people get caught up in the hype and the objective of finding Sasquatch. And the ultimate disappointment if that objective isn't reached in their lifetime. But I would not feel bad for Renee...........he made his choices, I think without regrets, and people get divorced all the time for a wide variety of things. Renee made his choice to do what he wanted and forget about money......... I made the opposite choice, but there are many days that I think I made the wrong choice. I don't need fancy cars, big houses, and a box seat at Yankee stadium to be happy. My idea of heaven is a small house, barn, a garden, venison in the stew pot and a good mountain horse to ride. And ultimately? I don't believe in Squatch, but I believe in the possibility that there is something out there........but if it's not out there, it's not going to give me a nervous breakdown. I just count every day I get to spend in the wilderness not punching a time clock, either hunting, fishing, riding my horse, looking for Squatch, looking for old gold mines, cutting firewood, baking biscuits in a dutch oven, etc? A BLESSING.