Leaderboard

It's pretty sad when the debunking scientific findings can't even give the name of the scientist doing the work or show and describe the sample.

Really? You do know that 99% of all excavations are the recovery of stone tools (flaked material such as obsidian, jasper, chalcedony, and then pounding implements like manos, metates, mortars, etc.)? Then there are rock walls, round houses foundations, umicha foundations, midden, etc. Very few exacations are of any bone because the acid of the soil eats organic material. That is what creates midden - organic material that has melted into the earth and creates a black oily soil that indicates humans occupied that place. Classic skeptic response. You don't have any idea what you are talking about, but still keep talking. Spare all the rest of us, because it's old and tired.

I know people that have done archaeological excavations on one single site for their entire career and still don't have a grasp on what happened there. Years? Yeah that is how science works.

This is the riddle - so skeptics want a body to prove wood apes are real - yet then mock those that are trying to do just that. Funny, isn't it? It just tells me you really don't want them to be proven real...