Leaderboard

It is my guess that at some point, when you have been convinced, beyond any doubt, say perhaps by having a daytime sighting, or something of that magnitude, that evidence is no longer needed. By that I mean that evidence has been met for that individual to no longer need proof, they have seen it and know it is real. However, for all of us who have not seen it, whether or not we claim any other experiences with them, we will always want that definitive proof, and that is why I would like to document anything I can to help uncover the truth of the situation. It is still possible within my skeptical mind to doubt they even exist, yet what I heard and experienced keeps me from arriving at any conclusion, if your honest you can venture forward, if you just do not want it to exist, then heck what are you wasting time for arguing against it's existence. Are you really that freeking bored that you spend your time here arguing against something you do not believe exists, because for a fact you cannot know it does not exist. This might actually be more dysfunctional than some eclectic persons supposed experience. I have no time for this at all, I would not be wasting my time if I did not have a very real suspicion that they are really visiting my freeking backyard, and that I might actually be able to demonstrate that to you....

This is a Bigfoot discussion forum. It is not a laboratory for evaluating field samples of possible evidence. If you are looking for proof, its in the field. Have to ask: If you saw a Bigfoot in broad daylight at close range would you recognize it based on how other people have described them? To you personally, would that be proof that they do in fact exist? Respectfully