Leaderboard

It is foolish and intellectually dishonest to conclude that there is not a single shred of hard evidence. This track casting on my shelf is quite hard and absolutely is evidence. Perhaps, as other (faux?) skeptics do, you deliberately and mistakenly insist on equating the terms proof and evidence despite having the difference pointed out to you repeatedly? MIB

And the foot that may have created that impression? Nary a trace.

Large human skeletons have been found. And I don't mean just big, I mean huge....10-12' tall. What happens after they are found is one of two things: 1) the folks who uncover them (erroneously think they're doing the right thing) contact authorities, and within a day "officials" show up and take the bones; leaving the honest landowners with nothing but a cool story. 2) folks who are wise to the coverup do not call anyone and keep the find to themselves and, unfortunately, the rest of the world doesn't get the benefit of knowing the truth.

There is no absence of evidence. There is an absence of evidence YOU accept. Big, BIG difference. MIB

Distinct possibility. The sheer volume of close proximity reports cannot be denied or glossed over. Are each and everyone of these errors or lies? Some? Yes undoubtedly. Most? Quite possibly. All? Highly unlikely.