Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/02/2014 in all areas

  1. It's just THIS government that does that; the other countries with populations of enigmatic primates are pretty open about the work their agencies have done in regards to their "BF" types. It's really not a conspiracy; they just don't have an agency to manage BF. Closest thing they have is the Dept. of Health and Human Services, but they are all tied up in some kind of insurance scam program right now.
    1 point
  2. Hello All, Why would anyone need a Sasquatch to be known in order to protect it's habitat in the first place. Protecting habitat soley for the sake of the habitat itself should be enough IMO. I mean why should it take a Spotted Owl for us to practice good stewardship?
    1 point
  3. For the sake of curiosity, what makes what you are doing any different? At least there are solid parallels for DWA's position. Only a portion of any disease is identified. Only a portion of any particular type of crime is reported. You can ask any epidemiology specialist or law enforcement professional, they can confirm this. So there is some rational basis for his claims. Your position, on the other hand, only seems to be backed by your own wishful thinking. Can you cite examples to back your claim? If not ... the argument you offer is invalid. MIB
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...