For the sake of curiosity, what makes what you are doing any different?
At least there are solid parallels for DWA's position. Only a portion of any disease is identified. Only a portion of any particular type of crime is reported. You can ask any epidemiology specialist or law enforcement professional, they can confirm this. So there is some rational basis for his claims.
Your position, on the other hand, only seems to be backed by your own wishful thinking. Can you cite examples to back your claim? If not ... the argument you offer is invalid.
MIB