Leaderboard

Apparently I'm in the minority here, but if I ever stumbled upon a dead Sasquatch body, I'd just leave it. Obviously nature or the Sasquatch themselves have done a good job taking care of their dead up until now, so I'd let that cycle continue. I see no need to collect any evidence in an attempt to prove their existence once and for all. And I honestly don't think I could live with myself if I made a financial profit, however large, off a dead Sasquatch, knowing what that proof of existence would inevitably mean to their future. If I could be assured that such proof would be met only with the finest efforts for conservation so that the Sasquatch people could continue to live as they always have or better, then perhaps I would be inclined to collect evidence to finally prove their existence to the world. However, seeing the track record mankind has had with rare species of animals, I feel it's in the Sasquatches best interest never to be proven beyond a relatively few number of "civilized" people. To paraphrase a line from The Lost World: Jurassic Park... "They don't need our help to survive. They need our absence."

^Do you have any evidence to back up that claim?

Well sir, I do believe that the majority that has had an interest in this thread is more interested in what Bipto has to report or explain than your constant "repeat recording style of questioning". His patience from the beginning has been much appreciated. Edited for bad speeling, lol

If someone makes a claim that Giant Hairy beasts are hucking rocks at cabins, I think the logical counter question is "Do you think an animal that hucks rocks at cabins would not have been killed by the people living in those cabins?" If Bipto wants to make this into a thread where no one can question his claims that is fine, but I think it is quite clear in the rules that claims are allowed to be questioned. And at the same time, the rules state that if you make a claim you should be able to handle the questions that come with it. I think this is Bipto's way of terraforming this thread into a format that allows his claims to go unquestioned. A Bigfoot Forums Genesis project if you will.

Plus that Doc. Since I heard about the ignore option several months ago, I implemented it three times the first day and once more a bit later. Can't say for certain that that was responsible for bringing my blood pressure back down to a healthy range, but it didn't hurt. I enjoy a healthy, challenging, on topic discussion amongst grown-ups as much as the next person but am easily bored by seemingly endless repetition. Life's too short for boring BFF! Looking forward to fresh news from N.A.W.A.C. as things heat up, literally and figuratively, in X.

but instead of bowing out, how about just using the "ignore" feature?? if bipto and enough of the interested parties discussed who is who via PMs , then put the usual suspects on ignore the conversation could carry publicly on if there is anything left to say . interruptions that fall on deaf ears might blow away on the breeze with little or no attention....... just a suggestion.

Everyone has no doubt seen this: