Leaderboard

An interesting quote by Byrne: http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-31252-portland_expert_bigfoot_researcher_bickering_has_delayed_finding_bigfoot.html

Does it? Who does? I think John Napier pretty much nailed this one down when he pointed out shortly after the film was made that the centre of gravity of the supposed animal is just all wrong. You tell me which bits of the massive pile of evidence convince you it's a sasquatch. Not just arm flailing and shouting "there's just so much of it". A big pile of crap is still crap. Which bits of the big pile convince you? And no, I'm not a scientist. I never said I was, or claimed to have any special insights into science. You are the one who continually does. I , despite being an average layman, can see you are continually and constantly wrong about that, regardless of whether Bigfoot exists or not. I have no axe to grind on that, I don't believe it does, but I find it very interesting. Your continual claims that you know better than everyone else in the world, however, are irritating in the extreme. I just wish some people who do believe in Bigfoot would occasionally tell you how wrong you are, so you can't try to drag the argument back to whether it exists rather than addressing your claim that the evidence shows it exist. And perhaps the scientist's opinion is th same as the garbageman's because the garbageman has enough scientific training to see an obvious alternative explanation for such evidence as exists A perfectly valid and possible explanation. It's all mistakes and lies. I do not have to prove that, as I am not saying it IS the case, just that it is the most likely. You have to show me something that cannot be a mistake or a lie. The numbers don't come close to the tipping point on that. You can't trust the science because you don't understand it. All those people who do, have said it's nonsense. That's the problem with it.